2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.106.205150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing quantum scars and weak ergodicity breaking through quantum complexity

Abstract: Scar states are special many-body eigenstates that weakly violate the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH). Using the explicit formalism of the Lanczos algorithm, usually known as the forward scattering approximation in this context, we compute the Krylov state (spread) complexity of typical states generated by the time evolution of the PXP Hamiltonian, hosting such states. We show that the complexity for the Néel state revives in an approximate sense, while complexity for the generic ETH-obeying state a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We only discuss operator complexity in this paper. For state complexity and its applications, the reader is directed to [20,45,46,50].…”
Section: Lanczos Algorithm and Krylov Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We only discuss operator complexity in this paper. For state complexity and its applications, the reader is directed to [20,45,46,50].…”
Section: Lanczos Algorithm and Krylov Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…been found in real-life examples while studying the state complexity of many-body scars [46]. The Hamiltonian of such a system is given by…”
Section: Chaotic: Bn ∼ Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from by some initial state ⟨w 0 and u 0 ⟩, one follows the following recursive algorithm [58]: The algorithm recasts the Hamiltonian into the form (C.1) (and thereby (2.12)). Therefore, one can choose an initial state (in a lattice system, this can be thought of as a ground state of some arbitrary Hamiltonian, see [59] for an example) and evolve this with the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. In the case of a Hermitian Hamiltonian, the tridiagonalized matrix form of the Hamiltonian is usually known to have real, but nonzero, diagonal coefficients [57,60].…”
Section: Appendix: a Generalized Version Of Spread Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimisation of the spread complexity in the Krylov basis requires extracting the Lanczos coefficients associated to the Hamiltonian of the model 8 . A previous discussion in the literature [117] attempted to approximate the broken su (2) symmetry within the scar subspace of the parent Hamiltonian using a quantum-deformed su (2) q symmetry and associated Lanczos coefficients. However, as we explicitly demonstrate in this work one needs to be cautious both in the terms of capturing the symmetry breaking via su (2) q and interpreting its physical implications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%