2021
DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/abf1ca
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the Atmospheric Precipitable Water Vapor with SOFIA, Part I, Measurements of the Water Vapor Overburden with FIFI-LS

Abstract: We report on the measurements of telluric water vapor made with the instrument FIFI-LS on SOFIA. Since November 2018, FIFI-LS has measured the water vapor overburden with the same measurement setup on each science flight with about 10 data points throughout the flight. This created a large sample of 469 measurements at different locations, flight altitudes and seasons. The paper describes the measurement principle in detail and provides some trend analysis on the 3 parameters. This presents the first systemati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the [O I]63 μm and the CO(14 → 13) lines are on the wings of broad telluric water absorption features and the spectra have strong continua, we were able to fit the atmospheric model to the spectra by letting PWV be a free parameter. We obtained values between 2 and 3 μm of PWV for these flights, which are consistent with those derived from satellite data (Iserlohe et al 2021) for the 2016 data as well as the FIFI-LS measurements taken directly before and after the data acquisition in 2019 (Fischer et al 2021). Thus we used 2.5 μm PWV for all observations.…”
Section: Data Reductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Since the [O I]63 μm and the CO(14 → 13) lines are on the wings of broad telluric water absorption features and the spectra have strong continua, we were able to fit the atmospheric model to the spectra by letting PWV be a free parameter. We obtained values between 2 and 3 μm of PWV for these flights, which are consistent with those derived from satellite data (Iserlohe et al 2021) for the 2016 data as well as the FIFI-LS measurements taken directly before and after the data acquisition in 2019 (Fischer et al 2021). Thus we used 2.5 μm PWV for all observations.…”
Section: Data Reductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Since the [O I]63 µm and the CO(14 → 13) lines are on the wings of broad telluric water absorption features and the spectra have strong continua, we were able to fit the atmospheric model to the spectra by letting PWV as a free parameter. We obtained values between 2 and 3 µm of PWV for these flights which are consistent with those derived from satellite data (Iserlohe et al 2021) for the 2016 data as well as the FIFI-LS measurements taken directly before and after the data acquisition in 2019 (Fischer et al 2021). Thus we used 2.5 µm PWV for all observations.…”
Section: Data Reductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In order to test the PWV determination procedure implemented in the pipeline, it is useful to compare the derived FORCAST PWV values with those obtained from the dataset generated by the ECMWF's fifth European Re-analysis (ERA5) (Hersbach et al 2020). Briefly, the ERA5 combines observational data from satellites, aircraft, and in situ surface stations across the globe with models to generate a globally complete and internally consistent set of atmospheric parameters on a regular longitude-latitude grid with a spatial resolution of 31 km, over 37 pressure levels ranging from 1 mbar to 1000 mbar, at a time resolution of one hour every day from 1950 onwards.…”
Section: Comparison With Era5-ecmwf Pwv Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is the fourth in a series in which we discuss novel atmospheric calibration efforts for data acquired with the instruments on board SOFIA. In paper I (Fischer et al 2021) we discussed in detail the method for determining the atmospheric absorption in spectra obtained with the Field Imaging Far-Infrared Line Spectrometer (FIFI-LS) using in situ PWV measurements estimated from FIFI-LS observations designed to target specific water features. In paper II (Iserlohe et al 2021), we presented a comparison between the estimates of PWV derived from the direct FIFI-LS observations of water vapor emission features measured in-flight and the PWV values obtained from the ERA5-ECMWF data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%