2014
DOI: 10.1021/nl501845m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the Internal Electric Field in GaN/AlGaN Nanowire Heterostructures

Abstract: We demonstrate the direct analysis of polarization-induced internal electric fields in single GaN/Al0.3Ga0.7N nanodiscs embedded in GaN/AlN nanowire heterostructures. Superposition of an external electric field with different polarity results in compensation or enhancement of the quantum-confined Stark effect in the nanodiscs. By field-dependent analysis of the low temperature photoluminescence energy and intensity, we prove the [0001̅]-polarity of the nanowires and determine the internal electric field streng… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample description. The investigated NWs were grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy (T substrate = 790°C, T Ga = 916°C, T Al = 1069°C) on Si (111) substrates 19,29 . Figure 1 illustrates the GaN NWs (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sample description. The investigated NWs were grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy (T substrate = 790°C, T Ga = 916°C, T Al = 1069°C) on Si (111) substrates 19,29 . Figure 1 illustrates the GaN NWs (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, heterostructures based on these materials suffer from a strong electric field induced by a piezo-and pyroelectric polarization parallel to the most natural crystal growth direction [0001], the so called c-axis [7][8][9][10] . The polarizationinduced internal fields cause a redshift of the exciton emission energy inside these heterostructures, known to be the prominent feature of the quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE) [11][12][13][14][15] , which is accompanied by a drastic decrease of the spatial electron-hole overlap in the direction of the c-axis 3,8,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . Different approaches to eliminate or to diminish the electric field across the optically active region in group-III-nitride heterostructures have been investigated, such as growth on non-or semi-polar crystal planes 26,27 , forcing the growth of the cubic zincblende phase 28 , or the screening of the fields with doping-induced free carriers 29 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we devote the final section of the present work to illustrate possible polarity inversions in nanostructured semiconductor materials, discussing a few examples of inversion boundaries, which eventually allow a smart manifold functionalization of the Polarity-Driven Growth of Vertical Nanowires. While semiconductor NWs have extensively been studied systems over 48 Poole et al, 49 Gao et al 50 → SAG B (P) Algra et al, 51 Dalacu et al, 52 Calahorra et al 53 → particle-assisted GaN A (Ga) Schuster et al, 33 Bengoechea-Encabo et al 54 → SAG B (N) Fernańdez-Garrido et al, 55 Bertness et al, 56 Schuster et al 57 → particle-assisted Muβëner et al 58 → spontaneous growth InN A (In) Wang et al 59 → spontaneous growth B (N) Stoica et al, 60 Chang et al, 61 Wang et al 59 → spontaneous growth ZnO A (Zn) Baxter et al, 62 Sallet et al, 63 Utama et al, 64 Guillemin et al, 65 Sun et al, 66 Nicholls et al 67 → spontaneous growth Scrymgeour et al, 68 Perillat-Merceroz et al, 69 Consonni et al 70 → SAG Jasinski et al 71 → particle-assisted B (O) Guillemin et al 72 → spontaneous growth Consonni et al 70 → SAG Sallet et al 63 → particle-assisted Figure 3. Intrinsic parameters of the binary compounds analyzed, such as the ratio between the constituent sizes (r b /r a ), including the cases of ionic (a), covalent (b), and atomic radius, and the ionic character of the compound showing the electronegativity for each constituent, χ, along with the difference in electronegativity for every considered compound (d), calculated following Pauling's expression (more details provided in the Supporting Information).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron-hole Coulombic interaction is not considered by the calculations, and hole tunneling from the stem might help to stabilize the exciton in the dot. The second emission line is hence assigned to a charged state of the exciton, which seems reasonable in view of the energy separation between the two peaks.The bias sensitivity of NW1 and NW2 lie almost one order of magnitude above those observed by Müßener et al16 in a dot-in-wire structure. The higher applied voltages required in their case can be explained by the thickness of their AlGaN+AlN barriers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 45%