2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the mass-loss history of AGB and red supergiant stars from CO rotational line profiles

Abstract: Context. The evolution of intermediate and low-mass stars on the asymptotic giant branch is dominated by their strong dust-driven winds. More massive stars evolve into red supergiants with a similar envelope structure and strong wind. These stellar winds are a prime source for the chemical enrichment of the interstellar medium. Aims. We aim to (1) set up simple and general analytical expressions to estimate mass-loss rates of evolved stars, and (2) from those calculate estimates for the mass-loss rates of the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
281
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(317 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
32
281
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Khouri et al (2014a) derive a mass-loss rate for W Hya of 1.5 × 10 −7 M yr −1 , compared to 1.0 × 10 −7 M yr −1 in our previous modelling (Maercker et al 2008). Based on a grid of models using GASTRoNOoM, De Beck et al (2010) derive a formula to estimate the mass-loss rates from AGB stars based on the intensities of the CO lines. Using their formula results in mass-loss rates that are less than a factor two different from the values derived here.…”
Section: Comparison To Radiative Transfer With Gastronoommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Khouri et al (2014a) derive a mass-loss rate for W Hya of 1.5 × 10 −7 M yr −1 , compared to 1.0 × 10 −7 M yr −1 in our previous modelling (Maercker et al 2008). Based on a grid of models using GASTRoNOoM, De Beck et al (2010) derive a formula to estimate the mass-loss rates from AGB stars based on the intensities of the CO lines. Using their formula results in mass-loss rates that are less than a factor two different from the values derived here.…”
Section: Comparison To Radiative Transfer With Gastronoommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations of molecular emission lines have been used to determine these properties. In particular, observations of CO emission lines have proven to be a useful tool to describe the mass loss (e.g., Schöier et al 2002;González Delgado et al 2003;Ramstedt et al 2008;De Beck et al 2010;Khouri et al 2014a). Observations of other molecules have led to important insights in the chemistry and structure of AGB CSEs (e.g., González Delgado et al 2003;Schöier et al 2007;Maercker et al 2008Maercker et al , 2009Decin et al 2010a;Cernicharo et al 2010Cernicharo et al , 2011De Beck et al 2012;Justtanont et al 2012;Khouri et al 2014b; Lombaert et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TheṀ gas are those given by De Beck et al (2010, o Cet and π 1 Gru), Maercker et al (2016, R Scl), Danilovich et al (2014, W Aql), and Bujarrabal et al (2010, R Aqr). P and υ ∞ were retrieved from Bujarrabal et al (2010) for R Aqr and from De Beck et al (2010) for the other sources. …”
Section: Comparison Between the Five Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSE has been modeled by several authors who report high gas-mass-loss rates ofṀ g ∼ 10 −5 −10 −4 M yr −1 (Netzer & Knapp 1987;Bowers & Johnston 1990;Justtanont & Tielens 1992;Loup et al 1993;Suh & Kim 2002;De Beck et al 2010). Owing to the high mass-loss rate, the density in the CSE is high enough for H 2 O ice to freeze out, shown by a strong absorption band around 3.1 μm Justtanont & Tielens 1992;Sylvester et al 1999 to 1342189961) taken in January 2010.…”
Section: Target Selection and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%