2002
DOI: 10.24908/ss.v1i3.3347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the Surveillant Assemblage: on the dialectics of surveillance practices as processes of social control.

Abstract: Recent dialogue on the contemporary nature of information and data gathering techniques has incorporated the notion of assemblages to denote an increasing convergence of once discrete systems of surveillance. The rhizomatic expansion of late modern 'surveillant assemblages' is purported not only to enable important transformations in the p urpose and intention of surveillance practices, but to facilitate a partial democratization of surveillance hierarchies. Seeking to account for the forces and desires which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
73
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem with the assemblage model, however, is that it tends to suggest that centralized, asymmetrical forms of (state) surveillance are no longer important. As Hier (2003) has demonstrated, investigation into the expanding applications of networked surveillance systems cannot come at the expense of insights into new and more efficient possibilities for monitoring practices that exacerbate already existing social divisions in the context of unequal relations of power. In focusing social analyses primarily on the expanding technological capabilities of surveillance systems, critics run the risk of neglecting the social dimensions and the diverse human and material implications of surveillance techniques-how they are socially constructed, how they penetrate social groups differently, and how they can contribute to the intensification of social inequality.…”
Section: Surveillance Social Control Securitization and Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem with the assemblage model, however, is that it tends to suggest that centralized, asymmetrical forms of (state) surveillance are no longer important. As Hier (2003) has demonstrated, investigation into the expanding applications of networked surveillance systems cannot come at the expense of insights into new and more efficient possibilities for monitoring practices that exacerbate already existing social divisions in the context of unequal relations of power. In focusing social analyses primarily on the expanding technological capabilities of surveillance systems, critics run the risk of neglecting the social dimensions and the diverse human and material implications of surveillance techniques-how they are socially constructed, how they penetrate social groups differently, and how they can contribute to the intensification of social inequality.…”
Section: Surveillance Social Control Securitization and Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sociological approaches (Hier, 2003), its comprehension of the flows and "nomadic" aspects of vigilance is really essential.…”
Section: New Surveillance Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that surveillance has not resulted in the ubiquity that the ideal for transparency would advocate. The ideal of transparency would suggest the surveillant gaze is too discriminatory, and is in need of "democratization" (Hier, 2003).…”
Section: Transparency In Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%