2019
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probiotics decrease the stress response and intestinal permeability of term neonates with low Apgar scores

Abstract: To observe the effect of probiotics on the stress responses and intestinal permeability of term neonates with low Apgar scores, the present study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 78 term neonates (42 males and 36 females). In the control group (n=38), total parenteral nutrition and comprehensive treatment (anti-infection therapy) were provided. In the observation group (n=40), the neonates were administered Lactobacillus Complex Capsules in addition to the control group treatment. The corticotropi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress of hypoxia or sepsis adversely affects the neuroendocrine and GI systems, inducing intestinal permeability and impaired functionality that may be regulated by probiotics 12. A retrospective clinical study from 2018 administered Bifidobacterium triple live capsules to neonates with initial Apgar scores of less than 7 points.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The stress of hypoxia or sepsis adversely affects the neuroendocrine and GI systems, inducing intestinal permeability and impaired functionality that may be regulated by probiotics 12. A retrospective clinical study from 2018 administered Bifidobacterium triple live capsules to neonates with initial Apgar scores of less than 7 points.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Administration of Bifidobacterium triple live capsules to neonates 37 to 41 weeks was linked to higher daily milk intake than controls (16.57 ± 2.58 mL vs 13.26 ± 1.87 mL). 12…”
Section: Enteral Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations