This study investigated the effects of an intervention designed to address the career exploration, decision-making, and problem solving needs of girls with learning disabilities. The sample consisted of 120 9th grade girls with and without disabilities. The intervention group consisted solely of girls with disabilities who participated in an eight-session program over a two-week period. All students completed the Career Maturity Inventory-Revised (CMI-R), which measures career exploration and decisionmaking abilities. They all also completed the Problem Solving Inventory (PSI). At pre-testing, there were statistically significant differences found for girls with disabilities as a whole for these constructs when compared to girls without disabilities. Girls with disabilities who participated in the intervention had significantly better scores at post-testing on the decision-making and problem solving variables. viduals with disabilities such as the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). However, research still shows that even thought some advancements have been made, the success rate for women in particular when it comes to employment and post-secondary education still lags far behind. Baldwin [1] noted that only 33% of women with disabilities were in the labor force in comparison to 69% of men with disabilities. Also reported was that among women with disabilities who are employed, the average earnings are $3,100 less than women without disabilities, $8,200 less than men with disabilities, and $14,200 less than men without disabilities. According to Jans and Stoddard [26], women with disabilities were more likely to receive need-based services (programs reserved for individuals below a certain income level) such as food stamps, Medicaid, and public and subsidized housing. They also noted that more women that men were living in poverty: 34% of women who reported a work disability lived in poverty compared