2015
DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2015.1070082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problematizing Bayesian approaches to prehistoric chronologies

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the uncertainty surrounding these methods in connection with the evaluation of human settlement (Contreras andMeadows 2014, Torfing 2015), we concur with other authors in considering this as a useful tool for observing general tendencies (Shennan et al 2013). Recently, there has been a notable increase in the use of summed probabilities of calibrated dates, as an efficient way of taking a panoramic view of historical processes, that it serves more specifically as an approximate demographic indicator (Gamble et al 2005;Timpson et al 2014;Timpson et al 2015;Pettitt and Zilhão 2015;Balsera et al 2015b;Downey et al 2016;Drake et al 2016).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Despite the uncertainty surrounding these methods in connection with the evaluation of human settlement (Contreras andMeadows 2014, Torfing 2015), we concur with other authors in considering this as a useful tool for observing general tendencies (Shennan et al 2013). Recently, there has been a notable increase in the use of summed probabilities of calibrated dates, as an efficient way of taking a panoramic view of historical processes, that it serves more specifically as an approximate demographic indicator (Gamble et al 2005;Timpson et al 2014;Timpson et al 2015;Pettitt and Zilhão 2015;Balsera et al 2015b;Downey et al 2016;Drake et al 2016).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Bayesian analysis was used to estimate the age of the sedimentary layers and to check the probability of a match between this model and particular dates, as is usually practiced in chronological studies in the archaeology of the Palaeolithic (see, e.g., Blockley et al ; Higham et al , ; Bobak and Połtowicz‐Bobak ; Pettitt and Zilhão ). The sequence model of OxCal version 4.2.4 (Bronk Ramsey ) was applied, with the sedimentary layers in Nietoperzowa Cave as described by Chmielewski () and Madeyska‐Niklewska () used as phases for OxCal model purposes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(…) Based on the principle of "garbage in, garbage out" we must surely treat even the simplest of models as speculative, and therefore subject to scrutiny. P. B. Pettitt and J. Zilhao [94] With the established psychic nucleation of the relatively autonomous and independent neuropsychological complex called epigenetic function of the real or state of consciousness, the world ceases to be just lived to be also interpreted.…”
Section: From Speech Communication To the World Generated By Naming Itmentioning
confidence: 99%