8 It describes the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP), a regime that is being promoted throughout the United Kingdom for the care of people dying of malignant or nonmalignant disease in hospitals, care homes for the elderly, private residences, and hospices. The aims are to improve the care of the dying in the community and reduce emergency admissions to overburdened hospitals. The LCP employs traditional palliative care regimes, advocates the use of syringe drivers and powerful medication according to hospice practice, and virtually ignores the hydration debate. This approach is likely to become an integral part of the National Health Service (NHS) End of Life Care Programme unless wiser council prevails. Changing Gear 2006 includes a table apparently taken from a publication by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), whose representatives consider it "best practice" to make decisions "to discontinue inappropriate interventions, including blood tests, intravenous fluids, and observation of vital signs in the last hours and days of life." 9 The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence is an organization with a nasty habit of prohibiting the use of various treatments in the NHS on the basis of a cost/benefit analysis. This may suit politicians and economists, but it raises ethical, medical, and legal dangers that must not be ignored. Lo and Rubenfeld 10 have stressed that palliative sedation must be carefully distinguished from euthanasia. If correctly used, it can be justified as a last resort if certain criteria are met, namely that intolerable symptoms cannot be relieved in any other way, the patient is at the point of death, and the intention is to relieve symptoms, not shorten life. 10 The LCP is unlikely to fulfill the Lo and Rubenfeld criteria in all cases, for it could well make death under palliative sedation the norm rather than a last resort. If that happens, we will be only a From Medical Ethics Alliance (UK), United Kingdom.