An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay has been used to diagnose serologically the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Asian life-long vegans. There was no difference in the seropositivity between these individuals and a group of age- and sex-matched Asian meat-eaters, indicating the meat consumption is not a risk factor for H. pylori infection. However, both Asian groups had a higher prevalence of infection than age- and sex-matched Caucasian meat-eaters. Additionally, the Asian individuals had a wider range of specific IgG antibody concentrations than the Caucasians. This did not appear to be due to antigenic cross-reactivity between H. pylori and Campylobacter jejuni. The significance of these observations to the establishment of cut-off levels for the serodiagnosis of certain ethnic groups is discussed.
Two hundred and fifty patients were admitted to a prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy of Augmentin with metronidazole in the prevention of sepsis after appendicectomy. Pre-operatively they received either 500 mg metronidazole or 1.2g Augmentin intravenously. Those patients with gangrenous or perforated appendices received eight additional doses of the trial drug at 8 hourly intervals. Overall there were 13 wound infections in the Augmentin group (11 per cent) and 21 in the metronidazole group (18 per cent). The 90 per cent confidence limits for the overall 7 per cent difference in infection rates were +/- 8.5 per cent. There were high rates of wound infection in the gangrenous group (Augmentin 8 per cent versus metronidazole 19 per cent) and especially in the perforated group (Augmentin 33 per cent versus metronidazole 63 per cent). There was no statistically significant difference between the infection rates with the two antibiotics but our study suggests that Augmentin, which is active against both aerobes and anaerobes, may be more effective than metronidazole in reducing wound sepsis after appendicectomy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.