Problems of Modernization of Modern Russian Elite

Ziryanov, Sergei; Ponedelkov, Aleksandr; Vorontsov, Sergey

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2474707

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…New spatial and strategic approaches to the analysis of regional economic systems and changes in the structure of the economy involve the study of factors and, first of all, the sufficiency of resource provision for development in terms of localization of employed, fixed assets [1][2][3][4], concentration processes, cooperation and the scale of regional industrial production [5][6], the growth rate of gross value added, the rate of structural shifts, in the commodity filling of exports and the level of its manufacturability, as the most significant indicator of the competitiveness of the economy [7][8][9] and others. It should be noted that the analysis of the susceptibility of the regional economy to crises and, as a consequence, the cyclical changes in the level of concentration / diversification in the sector of core activities, due to both exogenous and endogenous causes, including a change in scientific and technological platforms 3 , does not go unnoticed by researchers [10][11][12][13].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selection of effective industry benchmarks for the development of mono-specialized regions

Danilova

Pravdina

2021

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of the industrial potential of the regions is an urgent task of state policy and requires the development of a set of measures that can take into account not only the structural characteristics of the regional economy, but also the efficiency of the industries. A coupled assessment of changes in concentration and efficiency will allow to get a more complete picture of the sectoral structure of the region’s economy and to more accurately rank measures of state support. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the criteria and assess the unidirectionality (multidirectionality) of shifts in industry concentration and efficiency on the example of monospecialized regions of the metallurgical profile. In the work, the assessment of the localization and efficiency of manufacturing industries by regions was carried out, the positioning of the regions according to the corresponding indicators and their comparative studies were carried out, taking into account the growth rates of the regional economy. According to the results of the assessment, the regions showed a different nature of changes in the manufacturing industry. The Krasnoyarsk Territory has demonstrated a high degree of efficiency with a low localization of the industry, while the growth rates of the regional economy are relatively low, which may indicate the ongoing restructuring processes in the manufacturing industry in favor of more competitive industries. The Chelyabinsk Region showed the highest localization with low efficiency, with the exception of investment efficiency, which may indicate difficulties in transforming the region’s sectoral structure. The focus of further research can be aimed at assessing detailed types of activities within the manufacturing industry in order to identify the factors of ongoing changes and develop point measures to support the relevant industries. Keywords: effective specialization of regions, regional development, localization of activities, sectoral efficiency, monospecialized regions, sectoral benchmarks.

show abstract