1972
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.67.5.682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems of nomenclature for banded ferruginous-cherty sedimentary rocks and their metamorphic equivalents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A most valuable discussion of the problems of nomenclature for banded ferruginous-cherty sedimentary rocks has been given by Brandt et al (1972), recommending the usage of the term "iron-formation" as a generic lithologic name, strictly on a parallel, for example, with "limestone". The words are in this case hyphenated but capitalized when using them in a stratigraphic sense as, for example, "Brockman Iron Formation" as suggested by Trendall and Blockley (1970).…”
Section: Terminology and Definition Of Iron-formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A most valuable discussion of the problems of nomenclature for banded ferruginous-cherty sedimentary rocks has been given by Brandt et al (1972), recommending the usage of the term "iron-formation" as a generic lithologic name, strictly on a parallel, for example, with "limestone". The words are in this case hyphenated but capitalized when using them in a stratigraphic sense as, for example, "Brockman Iron Formation" as suggested by Trendall and Blockley (1970).…”
Section: Terminology and Definition Of Iron-formationmentioning
confidence: 99%