Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice: Employees Organizational Commitments in Creative Industry

Abstract

The study aims to test and analyze organizational commitments of employees that are influenced by distributive and procedural justice in Surabaya. This study is included in the type of research survey used for explanation or confirmatory intent, or also called research for hypothesis testing i.e. to explain the influence of inter-variable or causal relationship between variables through Hypothesis testing. The sample of this study amounted to 100-200 respondents consisting of creative industry employees in Surabaya. The sampling technique on this study was done by proportional method of random sampling. Data is obtained through the dissemination and re-collection of questionnaires and then analyzed by using SEM. The purpose of the research is to identify the organizational commitment of employees who are the distributive and procedural justice influenced in Surabaya obtained through research by making model designs. The relationship model of the researched variables results in a distributive and procedural justice that has an important link to organizational commitments. The results of this study also have significant for distributive and procedural justice so that the organizational commitment of employees in Surabaya is optimal.

Diversity and Inclusion Favoritism: Creating Distributive Injustices That Erode Organizational Identity

“…Distributive injustice explains how employees assess fairness based on the level of division it creates (Asj'ari et al, 2020). The ability to assess fairness suggests that distributive injustice may be a reasonable evaluation method for organizational diversity and inclusion practices.…”

“…Diversity and inclusion practices are effective compliance measures to assess policymaking (Dannals & Miller, 2017). However, PEDI confirms that compliance measures should assess diversity and inclusion practices by the opposition it creates (Asj'ari et al, 2020). Therefore, diversity and inclusion practices that promote social collectives are likely to measure as a distributive injustice (Astuti & Ingsih, 2019).…”