“…. The encapsulating materials, typically a combination of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and/or tempered glass derivatives, impinge upon the conversion dynamics of the underlying PV technology. − Consequently, the addition of the encapsulants has a great influence on the spectral response and short-circuit current density generated within a PV device, particularly within the ultraviolet region (300–400 nm), where PMMA exhibits a sharp spectral cutoff . To counteract these additional losses, the fundamental architecture of the photoconductive material is drastically altered through surface passivation, surface texturing, or by tailoring the material band gap dynamics through selectively doping the crystal lattice. ,,, However, for each additional processing stage implemented into the device design, the fabrication costs grow. , To continue the reductions experienced in PV pricing, − alongside with the continuous improvement of the conversion efficiencies, − various alternative intricate architectures have been suggested. , As the complexity of the PV architecture continues to grow, optical modeling starts to become the preferred tool to resolve and decouple the complex physical phenomena affecting the energy harvesting.…”