2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process intensification of copper extraction using emulsion liquid membranes: Experimental search for optimal conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the D2EHPA concentration would not result in an improvement in the extraction of zinc because the viscosities of both the membrane and emulsion have a tendency to increase for higher carrier concentrations. Larger globules would then be produced and the diffusivity of the complex would be lowered under such conditions, as is noted by other authors [23]. From these data, it is concluded that the zinc extraction is diffusion controlled, but copper extraction is controlled by the interfacial reactions.…”
Section: Effect Of D2ehpa Concentration In the Emulsionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Increasing the D2EHPA concentration would not result in an improvement in the extraction of zinc because the viscosities of both the membrane and emulsion have a tendency to increase for higher carrier concentrations. Larger globules would then be produced and the diffusivity of the complex would be lowered under such conditions, as is noted by other authors [23]. From these data, it is concluded that the zinc extraction is diffusion controlled, but copper extraction is controlled by the interfacial reactions.…”
Section: Effect Of D2ehpa Concentration In the Emulsionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In some studies of Sengupta and co-workers [16][17][18], d 32 are 3.424, 3.38, and 2.72 m, respectively, at emulsification speed of 12,000 rpm and time of 30 min. Whereas, Gameiro et al [19] and Reis and Carvalho [20] found that d 32 are 2.13 and 1 m, respectively, prepared at 7,000 rpm and 20 min emulsification.…”
Section: High Shear Agitationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This effect on extraction rate became significant in short contact times of about 15 min [18]. On the other hand, increase in emulsion viscosity affects the dispersion behaviour of the emulsion that causes a decline in the interfacial areas [17]. It was reported that increasing the concentration of extractant promoted the permeation swelling, which diluted the stripping solution.…”
Section: Effect Of Extractantmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The internal drop sizes of the emulsion were measured microscopically using Olympus microscope model BH-2 attached with an Olympus photo micrographic system model PM-10 AD at a magnification of 600×. The Sauter mean diameter was calculated for each case based on the measurement of more than 1000 droplet sizes as discussed in our earlier paper [17].…”
Section: Emulsion Preparation and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%