2020
DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqaa024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing Ambiguous Social Identity: Disclosure of Identity and Phenotypic Prototypicality Affect Processing and Evaluation of Persuasive Messages

Abstract: This study investigates how news stories about models’ social identities, models’ actual social identities, and ease of categorization of models into societally predominant gender and racial categories affect processing and evaluation of persuasive messages. Participants read news stories about fashion companies that used transgender or biracial models in advertising campaigns or control stories and then viewed a series of still images edited to look like advertisements. Physiological responding and self-repor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering a wholistic view of our findings, it is possible that participants were paying more attention to the congruent (sports) ads and this was reflected in the engagement of the corrugator muscle region. This interpretation of the psychophysiological data is consistent with the self-report data and highlights the need to triangulate psychophysiological data with self-report (e.g., Bolls et al, 2001; Read, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Considering a wholistic view of our findings, it is possible that participants were paying more attention to the congruent (sports) ads and this was reflected in the engagement of the corrugator muscle region. This interpretation of the psychophysiological data is consistent with the self-report data and highlights the need to triangulate psychophysiological data with self-report (e.g., Bolls et al, 2001; Read, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…We operationalized affect in two ways. First, following standard practices in capturing the valence dimension of emotion (e.g., Read, 2020), participants reported positive and negative affect each using single items that ranged from 0 (= not at all ) to 9 (= completely ) ( M PositiveAffect = 2.43, SD PositiveAffect = 2.69; M NegativeAffect = 4.22, SD NegativeAffect = 2.97). Second, to assess group-level patterns in discrete affective reports, we asked participants to provide brief (i.e., 1–2 word) open-ended descriptions of how the Tweet made them feel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the few studies investigating people’s perception of racial ambiguity, one found that racially ambiguous synthetic characters are as effective as racially matched ingroup characters in generating identification and positive consumer attitudes ( Appiah & Elias, 2011 ). Another found objectively measured positive responses from audiences toward racially ambiguous models relative to unambiguous ones ( Read, 2020 ). Children received ambiguous faces well when the face shared their own phenotypic features.…”
Section: Race Racial Ambiguity and Projection Of An Individual’s Own ...mentioning
confidence: 99%