2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2003.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing chemically amplified resists on advanced photomasks using a thermal array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present problem can also be solved in a steady state domain for the following reasons. Although transient effects could affect the CD uniformity to an extent [11,12], the photo-chemistry and hence the CD accuracy is more sensitive only after the wafer reaches the amplification threshold of T SET [10]. Hence the 120 s baking process is done in two phases.…”
Section: Inverse Heat Conduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present problem can also be solved in a steady state domain for the following reasons. Although transient effects could affect the CD uniformity to an extent [11,12], the photo-chemistry and hence the CD accuracy is more sensitive only after the wafer reaches the amplification threshold of T SET [10]. Hence the 120 s baking process is done in two phases.…”
Section: Inverse Heat Conduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a)) of larger thermal mass [10,6]. This is true only when the natural convection effect from the top and side of the wafer substrate considered in [11][12][13] are eliminated. This can be done by providing a sealed container with proper size within which the baking is carried out.…”
Section: Temperature Uniformity Requirementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3][4][5][6] Typically the temperature nonuniformity during transient can be as large as 9 and 0.7°C during steady-state. 4 Most of the reported improvements [7][8][9][10][11] are the simulation results involving a preset heater temperature to achieve uniform wafer temperature. Schaper et al, 7 ElAwady et al, 12 and Tiffany and Cohen 2 reported improvements with temperature nonuniformity during the thermal cycle between 3 and 3.5°C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Most of the reported improvements [7][8][9][10][11] are the simulation results involving a preset heater temperature to achieve uniform wafer temperature. Schaper et al, 7 ElAwady et al, 12 and Tiffany and Cohen 2 reported improvements with temperature nonuniformity during the thermal cycle between 3 and 3.5°C. In most of these systems, the difficulties in achieving uniform temperature control are primarily due to the hardware systems, most of these are of large thermal mass, and/or involving separate bake/chill units with limited number of heating zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%