2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing of time within the prefrontal cortex: Recent time engages posterior areas whereas distant time engages anterior areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result suggests that PGs’ tendency to choose disadvantageously may not be specifically due to rapid discounting of past outcomes or to an inability to anticipate consequences of choosing cards from each deck (Yechiam et al, 2005). This result also implies (at least indirectly) that poor decision-making in PG may not be linked to impairments in the prefrontal cortex, since prior studies have linked prefrontal cortex damage to increased scores in the recency parameter (e.g., Koritzky et al, 2013). There was also no significant difference between PG and their controls on the choice consistency parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result suggests that PGs’ tendency to choose disadvantageously may not be specifically due to rapid discounting of past outcomes or to an inability to anticipate consequences of choosing cards from each deck (Yechiam et al, 2005). This result also implies (at least indirectly) that poor decision-making in PG may not be linked to impairments in the prefrontal cortex, since prior studies have linked prefrontal cortex damage to increased scores in the recency parameter (e.g., Koritzky et al, 2013). There was also no significant difference between PG and their controls on the choice consistency parameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This assumption is in line with brain-imaging studies showing that, as compared with non-gamblers, disadvantageous deck selection during the IGT is associated with enhanced activation within PGs’ brain-reward systems, such as the striatum and the mesolimbic dopamine system (Linnet et al, 2010, 2011a; 2011b; Power et al, 2012). One direction for future studies would be to examine brain-correlates of monetary gain sensitivity, estimated with the EV model (for an example of integrating EV model’s parameters with fMRI data analyses, see Koritzky et al, 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were asked to select one card at a time (100 trials in total) from one of the four decks (labeled A, B, C, and D). As described in previous studies (Bechara et al 2000b; He et al 2010; He et al 2012; Koritzky et al 2013) and the IGT manual (PAR, Inc.), two of the decks were disadvantageous because they yielded high immediate gain but a greater loss in the long run (i.e., net loss of 250 yuan on average over 10 cards), and two decks were advantageous because they yielded lower immediate gain but a smaller loss in the long run (i.e., net gain of 250 yuan on average over 10 cards). The IGT score [calculated by subtracting the total number of selections of the disadvantageous decks (A and B) from the total number of selections of the advantageous decks (C and D)] for the first 40 and last 60 trials were calculated to represent performance in decision under ambiguity and decision under risk respectively (Bechara et al 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Goldberg et al proposed that the left SFG is involved in allowing the individual to reflect upon sensory experiences, to judge their possible significance to the self, and to allow the individual to report about the occurrence of his sensory experience to the outside world (Goldberg et al, 2006). Others implicated the frontal pole area (Broadmann 10) in insight into one's future and the planning of future actions (McClure et al, 2004a; Fellows and Farah, 2005; D'Argembeau et al, 2008; Koritzky et al, 2013). These studies are quite consistent with our early conceptualization on the role of these regions in what we called a “reflective” system in the context of other rewards, namely drugs (e.g., Bechara, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of these instructions have been published previously (Bechara et al, 2000). We used an event-related design of the IGT which was described in a recent paper (Koritzky et al, 2013). Each trial of the IGT includes two phases: a decision phase and a feedback phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%