2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.9b00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing, Structure, and Transistor Performance: Combustion versus Pulsed Laser Growth of Amorphous Oxides

Abstract: Solution-phase growth of amorphous oxide semiconducting films will likely provide significant advances toward the realization of affordable, flexible, transparent electronics. However, solution processing methods are still under development, and the bulk of amorphous oxide studies investigate films grown via physical vapor deposition (PVD) methods. To leverage the existing knowledge base on amorphous oxides, this study directly compares one of the most promising solution processing techniques, combustion synth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This outcome is in agreement with a recent improvement in combustion processing, in which the current two-step fast annealing process anneals each thin-film layer for only 2 min/layer versus 20–60 min/layer in the conventional one-step combustion synthesis, thus reducing the annealing time so that there is insufficient time for full In–O crystallization. Also, note that differences in stability observed here (with respect to crystallization) between PVD and combustion-synthesized films are consistent with the literature . Furthermore, after 1.0 year at room temperature under an N 2 atmosphere, the F:In–O films remain macroscopically amorphous with no change in composition.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This outcome is in agreement with a recent improvement in combustion processing, in which the current two-step fast annealing process anneals each thin-film layer for only 2 min/layer versus 20–60 min/layer in the conventional one-step combustion synthesis, thus reducing the annealing time so that there is insufficient time for full In–O crystallization. Also, note that differences in stability observed here (with respect to crystallization) between PVD and combustion-synthesized films are consistent with the literature . Furthermore, after 1.0 year at room temperature under an N 2 atmosphere, the F:In–O films remain macroscopically amorphous with no change in composition.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Also, note that differences in stability observed here (with respect to crystallization) between PVD and combustion-synthesized films are consistent with the literature. 84 Furthermore, after 1.0 year at room temperature under an N 2 atmosphere, the F:In−O films remain macroscopically amorphous with no change in composition.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Recent studies have employed organic and inorganic additives to intentionally frustrate crystallization. 7,11,20,21 However, fundamental studies aimed at the low-temperature processed amorphous phase in solution-deposited In 2 O 3 TFTs are limited, 22,23 and therefore needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] Currently, IGZO TFTs are mainly being fabricated using vacuum technologies, such as sputtering, [8][9][10][11] chemical vapor deposition, [12,13] and pulsed laser deposition. [14,15] Meanwhile, solution processing can offer numerous advantages such as adjustable composition, capital effectiveness, and unlimited substrate size. [16] Recently, researchers have made great progress in the enhancement of the mobility and the stability of solution processed metal oxide semiconductors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%