Produção de Grupalidade e Exercícios de Autonomia na GAM: a Experiência do Rio Grande do Sul

Palombini, Analice de Lima; Ferrer, Ana Luiza; Oliveira, Douglas Casarotto de; Rombaldi, Júlia Arnhold; Azambuja, Marcos Adegas de; Pasini, Vera Lúcia; Saldanha, Olinda Maria de Fátima Lechmann

doi:10.22456/2238-152x.104142

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One study described participation as a tool to increase political reflection, bring attention to the rights participants may have lost, and increase the relevance of research (Moreira, 2021 ). Studies that employed fourth-generation evaluation methods highlighted the importance of stakeholder involvement in all stages of research to level power asymmetries in research and increase the relevance of knowledge produced (Jorge et al, 2012 ; Emerich et al, 2014 ; Alves et al, 2018 ; Senna and Azambuja, 2019 ; Palombini et al, 2020 ). One example of fourth-generation evaluation included service users, managers, psychiatry residents, and family members to translate, adapt, and test a medication management tool for people with serious mental illness.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is reinforced by power imbalances favoring professional and academic knowledge (Onocko Campos et al, 2012 ). Increasing autonomy is an important treatment outcome in the selected studies (Kantorski et al, 2009 ; Onocko Campos et al, 2009 ; Jorge et al, 2012 ; Emerich et al, 2014 ; Lima et al, 2014 ; Gonçalves and Campos, 2017 ; Alves et al, 2018 ; Chassot and da Silva, 2018 ; Senna and Azambuja, 2019 ; Palombini et al, 2020 ; Passos et al, 2020 ; Moreira, 2021 ; Palmeira et al, 2021 ). Historically, the Psychiatric Reform movement posed the redefinition of the meaning of autonomy for community based mental health service users as a clinical-political challenge.…”

Section: Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To analyze the experiences of mental health service users with the development of the Medication Management Guide (GAM) group Nine studies reported on a multicentric study in partnership with a Canadian university that translated and implemented a medication management guide in community mental health centers in several regions of Brazil (Jorge et al, 2012;Onocko Campos et al, 2012;Emerich et al, 2014;Silveira et al, 2014;Gonçalves and Campos, 2017;Chassot and da Silva, 2018;Senna and Azambuja, 2019;Palombini et al, 2020;Passos et al, 2020). Seven studies reported using principles of Guba and Licoln's fourth-generation evaluation, a constructivist methodfocused on negotiationthat engages stakeholder groups across all phases in iterative processes to reach consensus Lincoln, 1989, 2001;Kantorski et al, 2009;Onocko Campos et al, 2009;Jorge et al, 2012;Emerich et al, 2014;Moreira and Onocko-Campos, 2017;Alves et al, 2018;Palombini et al, 2020).…”

Section: Characteristics Of Sources Of Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

State of the art of participatory and user-led research in mental health in Brazil: A scoping review

Florence¹,

Bocalini²,

Cabrini³

et al. 2023

Camb. prisms Glob. ment. health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Participatory research denotes the engagement and meaningful involvement of the community of interest across multiple stages of investigation, from design to data collection, analysis, and publication. Traditionally, people with first-hand experience of psychiatric diagnoses, service users, and those living with a psychosocial disability have been seen objects rather than agents of research and knowledge production, despite the ethical and practical benefits of their involvement. The state of the art of knowledge about participatory research in mental health Brazil is poorly understood outside of its local context. The purpose of this article was to conduct a scoping review of participatory and user-led research in mental health in Brazil. We identified 20 articles that met eligibility criteria. Participation in research was not treated as separate from participation in shaping mental health policy, driving care, or the broader right to fully participate in societal life and enjoy social and civil rights. Studies identified several obstacles to full participation, including the biomedical model, primacy of academic and scientific knowledge, and systemic barriers. Our extraction, charting, and synthesis yielded four themes: power, knowledge, autonomy, and empowerment. Participation in this context must address the intersecting vulnerabilities experienced by those who are both Brazilian and labeled as having a mental illness. Participatory research and Global South leadership must foreground local epistemologies that can contribute to the global debate about participation and mental health research.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of Sources Of Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

State of the art of participatory and user-led research in mental health in Brazil: A scoping review

Florence¹,

Bocalini²,

Cabrini³

et al. 2023

Camb. prisms Glob. ment. health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In these initiatives, shared management guidelines for pharmacological treatment are established, supporting spaces for the exchange of experiences on medication by the actors involved (MARTINS-GONÇALVES; ONOCKO-CAMPOS, 2017; PAZOS; SADE; MACERATA, 2019). Therefore, it has been described that the user is the protagonist and co-responsible for the decisions related to their treatment, contributing to their empowerment and the exercise of rights (COUGO; AZAMBUJA, 2018;PALOMBINI, et al, 2020a;FAVERO, et al al., 2019).…”

Section: New Conceptions Of Citizenship Rights and Reconfigurations O...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Latin American Mad Studies: Conceptual Frameworks and Research Agenda

Madrid

2022

Physis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyzes the emergence of Mad Studies as an investigative tradition that proposes critical theories and alternative methodologies in the production of knowledge from people who have been labeled with psychiatric diagnoses. For Mad Studies, the meanings around Madness express the relationship of forces and the forms of oppression that constitute the field of mental health, therefore, they emphasize the political nature of the research that is developed in this field and sustain a questioning of the claim of objectivity and neutrality of the biomedical model. In this framework, through a review of the academic literature and netnography as a research method, the growing role of the communities that have received mental health care in Latin America to express their narratives in the public sphere is described, positioning themselves as agents of knowledge and political actors. Around these new grammars, Latin American Mad Studies are constituted as a research perspective towards the configuration of other ways of inhabiting madness and articulating their struggles for social emancipation in the contemporary regional scenario.

show abstract

“…En estas iniciativas, se establecen pautas de gestión compartida del tratamiento farmacológico, sosteniendo espacios de intercambio de experiencias sobre la medicación por los actores implicados (MARTINS-GONÇALVES; ONOCKO-CAMPOS, 2017; PAZOS; SADE; MACERATA, 2019). Por lo tanto, se ha descrito que la persona usuaria es protagonista y corresponsable de las decisiones relacionadas con su tratamiento, contribuyendo a su empoderamiento y al ejercicio de derechos (COUGO; AZAMBUJA, 2018;PALOMBINI et al, 2020a;FAVERO et al, 2019).…”

Section: Nuevas Concepciones De Los Derechos De Ciudadanía Y Reconfig...unclassified

Estudios Locos Latinoamericanos: marcos conceptuales y agenda de investigación

Madrid

2022

Physis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen El artículo analiza la emergencia de los Estudios Locos como tradición investigativa que propone teorías críticas y metodologías alternativas en la producción de saberes desde las personas que han sido etiquetadas con diagnósticos psiquiátricos. Para los Estudios Locos, los significados en torno a la locura expresan la relación de fuerzas y las formas de opresión que constituyen el campo de la salud mental, por lo tanto, enfatizan el carácter político de las investigaciones que se desarrollan en este ámbito y sostienen un cuestionamiento a la pretensión de objetividad y neutralidad del modelo biomédico. En este marco, mediante una revisión de la literatura académica y la netnografía como método de investigación, se describe el creciente protagonismo de las comunidades que han recibido atención de salud mental en América Latina para expresar sus narrativas en la esfera pública, situándose como agentes de conocimientos y actores políticos. En torno a estas nuevas gramáticas, los Estudios Locos Latinoamericanos se constituyen como una perspectiva de investigación hacia la configuración de otros modos de habitar la locura y articular sus luchas de emancipación social en el escenario regional contemporáneo.

show abstract

Produção de Grupalidade e Exercícios de Autonomia na GAM: a Experiência do Rio Grande do Sul

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

State of the art of participatory and user-led research in mental health in Brazil: A scoping review

State of the art of participatory and user-led research in mental health in Brazil: A scoping review

Latin American Mad Studies: Conceptual Frameworks and Research Agenda

Estudios Locos Latinoamericanos: marcos conceptuales y agenda de investigación

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About