2017
DOI: 10.1515/pac-2017-0404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Producing superhydrophobic/oleophobic coatings on Cultural Heritage building materials

Abstract: Water is the main vehicle of decay agents in Cultural Heritage building materials exposed to weathering. In this work, a simple method to produce superhydrophobic/oleophobic coatings building materials, including under outdoors conditions, has been developed. In addition, a study of the behavior of the developed coatings on different substrates (limestone, granite, concrete and wood) is reported. The addition of 40 nm-SiO2nanoparticles to a fluoroalkylsilane reduces surface energy and produces a Cassie-Baxter … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is responsible for the extreme wetting properties, which are discussed in the next paragraphs. The scenario revealed in Figure 2 for the siloxane+Ca(OH)2 coatings follows the results reported previously for the effect of SiO2 nanoparticles on the surface structure of siloxanebased composite coatings [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Surface structures reported for siloxane+SiO2 coatings on marble [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] are similar to those shown in Figure 2 for the siloxane+Ca(OH) 2 coatings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The latter is responsible for the extreme wetting properties, which are discussed in the next paragraphs. The scenario revealed in Figure 2 for the siloxane+Ca(OH)2 coatings follows the results reported previously for the effect of SiO2 nanoparticles on the surface structure of siloxanebased composite coatings [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Surface structures reported for siloxane+SiO2 coatings on marble [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] are similar to those shown in Figure 2 for the siloxane+Ca(OH) 2 coatings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In these early works, silica (SiO 2 ) nanoparticles were used as additives to roughen the surface of siloxane, acrylic, and perfluorinated polymer coatings [6][7][8]. Since then, SiO 2 nanoparticles have become the standard additives for the production of superhydrophobic polymer+nanoparticle composite coatings for natural stone protection [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Other nanoparticles, selected for the same purpose, are aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ) [8] and tin oxide (SnO 2 ) [8], as well as photo-catalytic and biocidal nanomaterials, such as titanium oxide (TiO 2 ) [8,13,[18][19][20][21], zinc oxide (ZnO) [12,19], and silver (Ag) [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure e shows photographs of four liquids (4 µL) for d‐HSC on various substrates (i.e., water drops in blue dyed by pigment, milk drops in white, coffee drops in brown, glycerol drops in transparency deposited on copper plate (Frame 1); PVC plate (Frame 2); glass slide (Frame 3); building stone (Frame 4); sponge (Frame 5); tissue paper (Frame 6)). All of the droplets are sphere‐like, and all of the d‐HSC‐coated substrates maintained its pristine surface colors . The properties can be attributed to the special porous nanostructure morphology of the silica coating influenced by solvent polarity .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The application of hydrophobic materials as protective coatings has been suggested as a potential solution for the surface protection of natural stones, used in cultural heritage [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. More recently, advanced hybrid and composite materials of special surface structures were produced for stone protection, offering enhanced hydrophobicity and in some cases superhydrophobicity [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. The static contact angle ( θ S ) of a water drop on a hydrophobic surface is 150° < θ S < 90°, whereas on a superhydrophobic surface, θ S becomes very large, typically > 150°.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%