2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product disposal penalty: Analysing carbon sensitive sustainable supply chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the authors leave the weighting of the three dimensions up to decision-makers. All three sustainability dimensions are also addressed in a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model (Nidhi and Pillai, 2019) and a fuzzy multi-objective integer linear programming model (Pourjavad and Mayorga, 2019). While these two papers seek to minimise costs and environmental effects (mainly CO 2 emissions) and maximise positive social impacts (mainly jobs created) simultaneously, Metta and Badurdeen (2011) developed a hierarchical MILP model, where the most important objective is the economic one, followed by the environmental and social one in this order.…”
Section: Decision-supporting Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the authors leave the weighting of the three dimensions up to decision-makers. All three sustainability dimensions are also addressed in a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model (Nidhi and Pillai, 2019) and a fuzzy multi-objective integer linear programming model (Pourjavad and Mayorga, 2019). While these two papers seek to minimise costs and environmental effects (mainly CO 2 emissions) and maximise positive social impacts (mainly jobs created) simultaneously, Metta and Badurdeen (2011) developed a hierarchical MILP model, where the most important objective is the economic one, followed by the environmental and social one in this order.…”
Section: Decision-supporting Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ding et al (2016) focused only on environmental performance in their study, while Rinsatitnon et al (2018) examined through both environmental and economic dimensions such as labor and equipment maintenance. Nidhi and Pillai (2019) addressed sustainable supply chain performance, aiming to develop a sustainable index by taking into account the economic, environmental and social impacts of material recovery. In order to determine the performance of the supply chain, emissions during production, recycling and disposal were evaluated.…”
Section: Waste Management In Sustainable Supply Chain Management (Sscm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrating sustainable practices within supply chains is increasingly recognised as essential for mitigating the negative impacts associated with manufacturing activities (Gold & Schleper, 2017). It serves as a dualpurpose strategy that addresses the pressing environmental and social concerns and positions companies to enhance their market competitiveness and operational resilience (Hussain & Malik, 2020;Nidhi & Madhusudanan Pillai, 2019). This is particularly relevant in today's dynamic market environment, characterised by rapid changes, heightened uncertainties, and increasing complexities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing innovative SSCM strategies offers a pathway to achieving a more sustainable, efficient, and responsible manufacturing process (Eggert & Hartmann, 2021). These strategies encompass a broad spectrum of practices, from adopting greener technologies and materials to fostering collaborative partnerships emphasising ethical and sustainable production methodologies (Brandenburg et al, 2014;Nidhi & Madhusudanan Pillai, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation