2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10874-006-9034-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product study of the reaction of OH radicals with isoprene in the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
81
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical mechanism employed in the model was RACM2 (Stockwell et al, 1997;Goliff et al, 2013), with implementation of the Mainz Isoprene Mechanism (MIM; Pöschl et al, 2000) and update versions by Geiger et al (2003) and Karl et al (2006) for isoprene reactions. The model was constrained by measured photolysis frequencies, ancillary meteorology and inorganic gas measurements, as well as VOC data.…”
Section: Box Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical mechanism employed in the model was RACM2 (Stockwell et al, 1997;Goliff et al, 2013), with implementation of the Mainz Isoprene Mechanism (MIM; Pöschl et al, 2000) and update versions by Geiger et al (2003) and Karl et al (2006) for isoprene reactions. The model was constrained by measured photolysis frequencies, ancillary meteorology and inorganic gas measurements, as well as VOC data.…”
Section: Box Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty range for this crucial (averaged) rate is estimated by Peeters and Müller (2010) to be between 0.3 and 1.3 times this adopted value, based on two independent experimental constraints: the observed yield of MVK and MACR in the OH-initiated isoprene oxidation experiments of Karl et al (2006) conducted at moderate NO levels, and the peroxy radical budget in the experiments of Paulot et al (2009b). In addition, Archibald et al (2010) concluded from box model simulations of the experiments by Paulot et al (2009b) that the 1,6-H shift rates estimated from first principles by Peeters et al (2009) should be both equalised and reduced to some extent in order to match the observations, in particular for the formation rate of hydroperoxides.…”
Section: The Leuven Isoprene Mechanism Lim0 (Peeters Et Al 2009; Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isoprene (Isop) is attacked by OH to form isoprene peroxy radical (Isop-O 2 ). Isop-O 2 then reacts with NO to produce Isop-O radical with the yield of 90% (Reaction R2a in Appendix C) and subsequently to produce HCHO, MVK, and MACR (Reactions R5a, b in Appendix C) with a yield of 63%, 35%, and 24%, respectively, in high-NO x conditions (Tuazon and Atkinson, 1990;Paulson et al, 1992;Ruppert and Becker, 2000;Paulot et al, 2009;Miyoshi et al, 1994;Sprengnether et al, 2002;Karl et al, 2006). On the other hand, Isop-O 2 also competitively reacts with RO 2 to produce HCHO, MVK, and MACR with a yield of 34%, 16%, and 20%, respectively, via Isop-O (Reaction R4a in Appendix C) under NO x -free conditions (Ruppert and Becker, 2000;Miyoshi et al, 1994).…”
Section: Appendix C Hcho Production Pathways C1 Hcho Yield From Oh-inmentioning
confidence: 99%