2021
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2021.1958919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production and characterisation of wood-fibre insulation boards (WFIB) from hardwood fibres and fibre blends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
1
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As with the internal bond strength, only the rigid boards were tested, because the flexible mats are mainly used for between-rafter insulation, where there is hardly any capillary water absorption. In contrast to other stud-Veröffentlichung 3: Examination of various hardwood and softwood fibres for the usage in wood fibre insulation boards (WFIB) ies that found significantly higher water absorption -in addition to higher strength properties -for comparable hardwood boards (Zabihzadeh 2010, Imken et al 2021b, this study revealed significant differences both among the five hardwood species and among the softwood fibres. Due to this strong variation, no general differences between hardwoods and softwoods could be determined.…”
Section: Physico-mechanical Properties Of Fibres and Wfibcontrasting
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As with the internal bond strength, only the rigid boards were tested, because the flexible mats are mainly used for between-rafter insulation, where there is hardly any capillary water absorption. In contrast to other stud-Veröffentlichung 3: Examination of various hardwood and softwood fibres for the usage in wood fibre insulation boards (WFIB) ies that found significantly higher water absorption -in addition to higher strength properties -for comparable hardwood boards (Zabihzadeh 2010, Imken et al 2021b, this study revealed significant differences both among the five hardwood species and among the softwood fibres. Due to this strong variation, no general differences between hardwoods and softwoods could be determined.…”
Section: Physico-mechanical Properties Of Fibres and Wfibcontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…While boards from larch and oak only showed low strength among the pMDI-bonded boards, birch boards showed the second lowest value among pMDIbonded boards and the lowest value among the mats bonded by . This is in agreement with the study of Imken et al (2021b), which also reported low compression strength for birch WFIB. This finding was attributed to the higher bulk density of the birch fibres compared to the other fibres tested.…”
Section: Physico-mechanical Properties Of Fibres and Wfibsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations