2019
DOI: 10.1590/1809-6891v20e-52300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PRODUCTION AND NUTRITIVE VALUE OF CANARANA ERECTA LISA (Echinocloa piramidalis Lam.) IN RESPONSE TO HARVEST INTERVALS

Abstract: The objective of this study was to compare and explain the variations in the production and nutritive value of canarana erecta lisa grass (Echinocloa pyramidalis Lam.) at different harvest intervals. The treatments corresponded to the cut intervals of 20, 27, 34, 41, 48, 55, 62, and 69 days. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with three replications. Each experimental unit had 6m2 (3m ×2m). The variables studied included forage production, canopy height, and nutritive value o harves… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several factors such as management, regrowth age, fertilization, cut height, phenological aspects, growth under shade and seasons might have a signi cant effect in the nutritional value of forages (Van Soest, 1982Velásquez et al, 2010, Santiago-Hernández et al, 2016, Silva et al, 2017, Coêlho et al, 2018, Vasconcelos et al, 2019, Schnellmann et al, 2020and Tesk et al, 2020 which affects digestibility in animals (Valente et al, 2010). Variability in structural carbohydrates (NDF, ADF) composition of the M. maximus collection may be in uenced by characteristics related to accession own physiological and metabolic aspects as the conversion e ciency of nitrogen and the rate of owering (Costa et al, 2017) which might generate a wide range of available accessions and could be used in plant breeding programs (Deo et al, 2020) to generate or select materials with the best IVDMD (Barahona & Sánchez-Pinzón, 2005) Protein content reduction during low precipitation periods might be caused by the lack of production of new leaves and tillers during dry season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors such as management, regrowth age, fertilization, cut height, phenological aspects, growth under shade and seasons might have a signi cant effect in the nutritional value of forages (Van Soest, 1982Velásquez et al, 2010, Santiago-Hernández et al, 2016, Silva et al, 2017, Coêlho et al, 2018, Vasconcelos et al, 2019, Schnellmann et al, 2020and Tesk et al, 2020 which affects digestibility in animals (Valente et al, 2010). Variability in structural carbohydrates (NDF, ADF) composition of the M. maximus collection may be in uenced by characteristics related to accession own physiological and metabolic aspects as the conversion e ciency of nitrogen and the rate of owering (Costa et al, 2017) which might generate a wide range of available accessions and could be used in plant breeding programs (Deo et al, 2020) to generate or select materials with the best IVDMD (Barahona & Sánchez-Pinzón, 2005) Protein content reduction during low precipitation periods might be caused by the lack of production of new leaves and tillers during dry season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors such as management, regrowth age, fertilization, cut height, phonological aspects, growth under shade, and season might have a significant effect on the nutritional value of forages (Van Soest, 1982;Velásquez et al, 2010;Santiago-Hernández et al, 2016;de Vasconcelos et al, 2019;Schnellmann et al, 2020;Tesk et al, 2020), which affects digestibility in animals (Valente et al, 2010). Variability in structural carbohydrates (NDF, ADF) in the M. maximus collection might be influenced by characteristics related to the accessions' own physiological and metabolic aspects such as the conversion efficiency of nitrogen and flowering rate (dos , which might generate a wide range of available accessions and could be used in plant breeding programs (Deo et al, 2020) to produce or select materials with the best IVDMD (Barahona-Rosales and Sánchez-Pinzón, 2005).…”
Section: Nutritional Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors such as management, regrowth age, fertilization, cut height, phonological aspects, growth under shade, and season might have a significant effect on the nutritional value of forages (Van Soest, 1982;Velásquez et al, 2010;Santiago-Hernández et al, 2016;de Vasconcelos et al, 2019;Schnellmann et al, 2020;Tesk et al, 2020), which affects digestibility in animals (Valente et al, 2010). Variability in structural carbohydrates (NDF, ADF) in the M. maximus collection might be influenced by characteristics related to the accessions' own physiological and metabolic aspects such as the conversion efficiency of nitrogen and flowering rate (dos Costa et al, 2017), which might generate a wide range of available accessions and could be used in plant breeding programs (Deo et al, 2020) to produce or select materials with the best IVDMD (Barahona-Rosales and Sánchez-Pinzón, 2005).…”
Section: Nutritional Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%