2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.104.173401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of a Fully Spin-Polarized Ensemble of Positronium Atoms

Abstract: Long-lived |m|=1 positronium (Ps) atoms are produced in vacuum when high density bursts of positrons with net polarization p{0} are implanted into a porous silica film in a 2.3 T magnetic field. We observe a decrease in the |m|=1 population as the density of the incident positron beam is increased due to quenching interactions between oppositely polarized Ps atoms within the target. Saturation of this density dependent quenching indicates that the initial positron spin polarization p{0}=28+/-1%, and demonstrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason why the maximum yield in Fig 4 (a) is larger than that of Fig 4 (b) is that the higher magnetic field that is required for attaining a high positron density leads to magnetic quenching of positronium [68]. This effect, which will not affect f d after around 0.75 T [69], reduces the amount of long lived Ps present by mixing m = 0 triplet and singlet states [70]. However, increasing the magnetic field also increases the positron beam density, and the increased Ps yield due to e-h pair production partially compensates for the magnetic quenching, otherwise the difference in percent delayed fractions would be around 40 % [71,54].…”
Section: B Ps Yieldmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The reason why the maximum yield in Fig 4 (a) is larger than that of Fig 4 (b) is that the higher magnetic field that is required for attaining a high positron density leads to magnetic quenching of positronium [68]. This effect, which will not affect f d after around 0.75 T [69], reduces the amount of long lived Ps present by mixing m = 0 triplet and singlet states [70]. However, increasing the magnetic field also increases the positron beam density, and the increased Ps yield due to e-h pair production partially compensates for the magnetic quenching, otherwise the difference in percent delayed fractions would be around 40 % [71,54].…”
Section: B Ps Yieldmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This approach provides a very clear signal (see Fig. 38), and can even be used to determine the spin polarization of the incident positron beam [362]. This is possible because CP violation in beta decay means that positrons produced from 22 Na sources are intrinsically spin polarized [590,591].…”
Section: Ps 2 Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is possible because CP violation in beta decay means that positrons produced from 22 Na sources are intrinsically spin polarized [590,591]. This polarization is not lost in moderation [592] or trapping processes [362], and carries over to the Ps, meaning that there will be an asymmetry in the fraction of m = ±1 states produced. Increasing the Ps density to the point where Ps-Ps scattering can occur will lead to losses via SEQ or Ps 2 molecule formation, but eventually the minority spin component will be exhausted, after which there will be The solid line is a fit to a model that includes a density-dependent PsPs induced decay rate.…”
Section: Ps 2 Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations