2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10450-015-9719-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of activated carbons from biodegradable waste materials as an alternative way of their utilisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the main way to get rid of wastes is their disposal on the landfills. However, their storage can cause serious environmental problems such as water and soil pollution (Nowicki et al 2016;Kostecka et al 2014). Therefore solutions that could lead to reduction in the amount of wastes or their reuse are searched for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the main way to get rid of wastes is their disposal on the landfills. However, their storage can cause serious environmental problems such as water and soil pollution (Nowicki et al 2016;Kostecka et al 2014). Therefore solutions that could lead to reduction in the amount of wastes or their reuse are searched for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical and chemical methods have been adopted for the conversion of these biomass wastes to activated carbons [12]. Physical activation involves the pyrolysis of the carbonaceous precursor at high temperatures followed by activation of the char in the presence of an oxidizing gas (CO 2 or water steam) [13,14]. In chemical activation, the raw material is firstly impregnated with strong activating agents such as ZnCl 2 , H 2 SO 4 , NaOH, K 2 CO 3 , H 3 PO 4 , KOH, among others, followed by thermal activation at temperatures ranging from 400 to 600 • C [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of corn cob activated carbon in the removal of some wastewater pollutants have been investigated and reported by some researchers, mercury [41], uranium [8], chromium [Cr(III) and Cr(VI)] [42], nitrogen dioxide and hydrogen sulphide [43], and arsenic [44]. No report is available in the open literature on the use of corn cob activated carbon for the decontamination of phenol contaminated effluent in a dynamic adsorption system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%