2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.08.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of human CD59-transgenic pigs by embryonic germ cell nuclear transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, we observed more severe developmental defects in the cloned piglets derived from EGCs than when using comparable transgenic Yucatan fibroblasts (see (Schmidt et al, 2015) for a thorough description on developmental defects in piglets made by SCNT). Ahn and coworkers (Ahn et al, 2010) also succeed in creating CD59-transgenic piglets using porcine EGC for SCNT. They transferred 1980 reconstructed embryos to 10 recipient sows resulting in 5 pregnancies and 15 piglets of which 5 died within the first 24 hours (Ahn et al, 2010) and thus also indicating that the EGCs do not have the same clonogenicity as murine embryonic cells (Oback, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, we observed more severe developmental defects in the cloned piglets derived from EGCs than when using comparable transgenic Yucatan fibroblasts (see (Schmidt et al, 2015) for a thorough description on developmental defects in piglets made by SCNT). Ahn and coworkers (Ahn et al, 2010) also succeed in creating CD59-transgenic piglets using porcine EGC for SCNT. They transferred 1980 reconstructed embryos to 10 recipient sows resulting in 5 pregnancies and 15 piglets of which 5 died within the first 24 hours (Ahn et al, 2010) and thus also indicating that the EGCs do not have the same clonogenicity as murine embryonic cells (Oback, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahn and coworkers (Ahn et al, 2010) also succeed in creating CD59-transgenic piglets using porcine EGC for SCNT. They transferred 1980 reconstructed embryos to 10 recipient sows resulting in 5 pregnancies and 15 piglets of which 5 died within the first 24 hours (Ahn et al, 2010) and thus also indicating that the EGCs do not have the same clonogenicity as murine embryonic cells (Oback, 2009). Finally, creating and maintaining porcine EGCs are laborious processes that require special technical skills (Petkov et al, 2011) It should be mentioned that the data for this paper is not collected as part of an experimental set up made to explore the correlation between cell differentiation potency and clonogenicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include pronuclear injection [4], oocyte transduction [34,35], embryo transduction [36,37] fibroblast transduction followed by SCNT [35], sperm-mediated gene transfer (SMGT) [38], fibroblast transfection followed by SCNT [34,35], and embryonic germ cell transfection followed by NT [39]. The main advantage of pronuclear injection is that large constructs can be integrated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the problem of HAR, GM pigs expressing the human membrane-bound complementary proteins have been generated (Table 1) such as GM pigs expressing the human decay-accelerating factor, DAF (CD55, MIM125240) (Murakami et al 2000;Lavitrano et al 2002;Lee et al 2011), the human complement regulatory protein CD59 (MIM107271) (Fodor et al 1994;Ahn et al 2010), and the human membrane cofactor protein CD46 (MIM120920) (Diamond et al 2001). Protection against HAR and extended survival have been observed upon transplantation of hearts, kidneys, or vascularized organs from these GM pigs into nonhuman primates (McCurry et al 1995;Zaidi et al 1998;Chen et al 1999;Diamond et al 2001).…”
Section: Gm Pigs For Xenotransplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%