2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of resistant starch by enzymatic debranching in legume flours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was consistent with previous reports, where the swelling power was reduced during HMT of rice starch [20], sweet potato starch [3] and sorghum starch [21]. Debranching treatment by pullulanase produces partially debranched amylopectin which can act like amylase and create highly crystalline structures, and thus further reduce the swelling power of EHMT starch [11].…”
Section: Swelling Power and Solubilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result was consistent with previous reports, where the swelling power was reduced during HMT of rice starch [20], sweet potato starch [3] and sorghum starch [21]. Debranching treatment by pullulanase produces partially debranched amylopectin which can act like amylase and create highly crystalline structures, and thus further reduce the swelling power of EHMT starch [11].…”
Section: Swelling Power and Solubilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Recently, various methods for the production of resistant starches from different resources have been reported, including heat-moisture treatment (HMT) [10], enzyme debranching [11], chemical modification [12], and cross-linking [13]. Among these methods, the heat-moisture treatment and enzyme debranching are safe and cost-effective methods for the production of resistant starches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 33% resistant starch of BG flour was lower than the 35.00% reported for red kidney (Eyaru, Shrestha, & Arcot, ), but higher than the 16.43% reported for chickpea (Garcia‐Alonso, Goni, & Saura‐Calixto, ), 25.40% for lentil (Bednar et al., ), and 11.03% for faba bean flours (Ambigaipalan et al., ). However, the 44.64% total starch content of the BG flour is within the 22%–45% (Utrilla‐Coello et al., ) and 33%–88% (Morales‐Medina, Munio, Guadix, & Guadix, ) reported for different leguminous flours.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Resistant starch fraction passes on to the colon, where it is fermented by the microorganisms producing mainly short chain fatty acids (SCFA). Due to this fact, RS has functional properties and positive effects on diabetes, some kinds of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, colonic health, obesity, and osteoporosis (Lunn & Buttriss, 2007;Nugent, 2005;Sajilata et al, 2006;Morales-Medina et al, 2014). Resistant starches have been shown to have equivalent and/or superior impacts on human health similar to that of conventional fiber-enriched food ingredients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%