2007
DOI: 10.1029/2007ja012499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of the cosmogenic isotopes 3H, 7Be, 10Be, and 36Cl in the Earth's atmosphere by solar and galactic cosmic rays

Abstract: In a follow‐up study to the earlier work of Webber and Higbie (2003) on 10Be production in the Earth's atmosphere by cosmic rays, we have calculated the atmospheric production of the cosmogenic isotopes 3H, 7Be, 10Be, and 36Cl using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code. This new calculation of atmospheric yields of these isotopes is based on 107 vertically incident protons at each of 24 logarithmically spaced energies from 10 MeV to 10 GeV, 102 times the number used in the earlier calculation, along with the latest cros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
184
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
17
184
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of model computations with direct beryllium production experiments (Usoskin and Kovaltsov 2008b;Kovaltsov and Usoskin 2010), and also the results of modelling of the short-living 7 Be isotope (Usoskin et al 2009a) suggest that some numerical models (Masarik and Beer 1999;Webber and Higbie 2003;Webber et al 2007) tend to underestimate the production.…”
Section: Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of model computations with direct beryllium production experiments (Usoskin and Kovaltsov 2008b;Kovaltsov and Usoskin 2010), and also the results of modelling of the short-living 7 Be isotope (Usoskin et al 2009a) suggest that some numerical models (Masarik and Beer 1999;Webber and Higbie 2003;Webber et al 2007) tend to underestimate the production.…”
Section: Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questions need to be answered. Several attempts have been made to evaluate that from the cosmogenic isotope data (Lingenfelter and Hudson 1980;Usoskin et al 2006b;Webber et al 2007), but the result was grossly uncertain (Hudson 2010;Schrijver et al 2012), mostly because of the large model uncertainties of the radionuclide production. A new step forward has been done recently by Usoskin and Kovaltsov (2012), who analyzed two 14 C and five 10 Be records over the last millennia and searched for possible signatures of extreme SEP events.…”
Section: Cosmogenic Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The usual proxy for the variability of cosmic rays and also for major SEP events is based on records of cosmogenic radionuclides, such as 10 Be measured in polar ice and 14 C measured in dendrochronologically dated tree rings [7,8]. A short list of possible candidates for major SEP events in the past was proposed recently [9] providing a statistic on the time scale of ten millennia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%