2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-010-0005-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Products of Random Matrices and Generalised Quantum Point Scatterers

Abstract: To every product of 2 × 2 matrices, there corresponds a onedimensional Schrödinger equation whose potential consists of generalised point scatterers. Products of random matrices are obtained by making these interactions and their positions random. We exhibit a simple one-dimensional quantum model corresponding to the most general product of matrices in SL (2, R).

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is striking that Formula (11.4) for γ µ looks much more complicated than the formula for γ(λ + i0). The fact the both formulae are correct is proved in Comtet et al (2010). We shall not reproduce the proof here, but some of the calculations in later sections will illustrate the simplifications that can occur when applying Furstenberg's formula to specific products of 2 × 2 matrices.…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is striking that Formula (11.4) for γ µ looks much more complicated than the formula for γ(λ + i0). The fact the both formulae are correct is proved in Comtet et al (2010). We shall not reproduce the proof here, but some of the calculations in later sections will illustrate the simplifications that can occur when applying Furstenberg's formula to specific products of 2 × 2 matrices.…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recommended reading. The lectures constitute an extensive development of some of the ideas presented in the papers by Comtet, Texier and Tourigny (2010;2011; and Comtet, Luck, Texier and Tourigny (2013); from the mathematical point of view, they are more or less self-contained, in the sense that anyone who is familiar with the basic concepts of probability, differential equations, complex variables, and group theory should be able to learn something from them.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mapping between RMP and 1D localisation models like the random Kronig-Penney model [3], was recently extended to general RMPs of SL(2, R) [16]. For the case of interest here, the mapping works as follows : consider a random mass given as a superposition of delta-functions m(x) = n η n δ(x − x n ), where coordinates are ordered x 1 < x 2 < · · · .…”
Section: Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It generally requires solving an integral equation to obtain the invariant measure of a continuous diffusion process on a real projective space [21]. In low dimensions this can be done with numerical quadrature [4], but this is not tractable for our high dimensional problem.…”
Section: Computing the Error Exponentmentioning
confidence: 99%