2016
DOI: 10.1080/01416200.2016.1139888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profession, professionalisation, professionality, professionalism — historical and systematic remarks using the example of German teacher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In current UK research on Religious Education (RE), there are no published studies, other than our own (Freathy et al 2014;Freathy et al 2016), focusing specifically upon 'professionalisation' as defined as the historical and institutional processes by which teachers of RE, as a collective occupational body, assumed their specific professional shape and characteristics over time (Horn 2016). Professionalisation differs from three other related concepts.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In current UK research on Religious Education (RE), there are no published studies, other than our own (Freathy et al 2014;Freathy et al 2016), focusing specifically upon 'professionalisation' as defined as the historical and institutional processes by which teachers of RE, as a collective occupational body, assumed their specific professional shape and characteristics over time (Horn 2016). Professionalisation differs from three other related concepts.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Professionalisation differs from three other related concepts. 'Professionalism' refers to the structural and collective characteristics of teachers of RE as professionals at any given point in time (Horn 2016). 'Professionality' refers to the professional characteristics, skills and competencies that a professional teacher must acquire.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings also resonate with the international multi-disciplinary debate on the place of religion in public life-or public square (Habermas 2008)-, and the related framings of political theology that demarcate discussions of secularity, secularism and secularization in religious education (Reimers 2019;Berger 1999;Bruce 2002;Casanova 1994Casanova , 2009Chaves 1994;Davie et al 2008;Habermas 2008;Habermas and Ratzinger 2008;Lewin 2017;Micklethwait and Wooldridge 2009;Stark 1999). To an extent, though that was not in focus here, these positionings may sometimes be entangled with the professionals' personal alignment to either a blend of theology (including denominational association) (Luodeslampi and Kuusisto 2017;Horn 2016;Vargas-Herrera and Moya-Marchant 2016) or a more confessionally-and critically-distanced religious studies oriented religious education (Barnes 2014;Baumfield 2016;Cush and Robinson 2014;Freathy et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This type of thinking is not geographically limited, as a considerable number of countries have proposed their own understandings of ideal teaching and teachers. Researchers from different regions have participated in the discussion of ideal images of teachers through analysis, recognition, and encouragement (Buchberger et al, 2000; Horn, 2016; Ingvarson, 1998; Mayer et al, 2005; Pupala et al, 2016). What this type of thinking can offer is the enrichment of our understandings of what effective teaching is, as well as practical suggestions for how to motivate and regulate teachers.…”
Section: Three Approaches To Inquiries Into Teacher Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%