“…The CRE field has a modest record of examining pedagogical and programmatic processes that facilitate positive change in outcomes (Allgood & Higginbotham, ; Bradford, Adler‐Baeder, Ketring, & Smith, ; Carlson, Barden, Daire, & Swartz, ; Higginbotham & Myler, ; Owen, Antle, & Barbee, ; Owen, Rhoades, Stanley, & Markman, ; Quirk, Owen, Inch, France, & Bergen, ). Also, several studies have found that program effects are moderated by baseline levels of individual and dyadic risk and distress, with greater risk and distress generally predicting greater improvement in intervention outcomes (Allen, Rhoades, Stanley, Loew, & Markman, ; Amato, ; Barton, Futris, & Bradley, ; Bodenmann, Hilpert, Nussbeck, & Bradbury, ; Carlson, Rappleyea, Daire, Harris, & Liu, ; DuPree, Whiting, & Harris, ; Epstein et al, ; Halford et al, ; Halford, Sanders, & Behrens, ; Hawkins & Erickson, ; McGill et al, ; Quirk, Strokoff, Owen, France, & Bergen, ; Schilling, Baucom, Burnett, Allen, & Ragland, ; Williamson et al, ).…”