2019
DOI: 10.1177/0899764019892089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professional Identity and the Determinants of Fundraisers’ Charitable Behavior

Abstract: This survey-based study ( n = 1,663) addressed charitable behaviors of fundraisers—key arbiters of others’ donations. Our research question was as follows: Are fundraisers’ charitable behaviors related to their professional identity? We found several anticipated differences in giving and volunteering behaviors (and their social determinants) in comparison with the general public and the influence of some fundraising-specific variables. Nearly all the fundraisers gave time and money and were more like … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The public—across various cultural and national contexts—is often uninformed or misinformed about fundraising's purposes, methods, processes, standards, and philosophies (Breeze, 2017; Breeze & Scaife, 2015; Shaker et al, 2019). In the US, fundraisers are sometimes valorized for providing an important service for social needs and sometimes plagued by stigma stemming from conceptions that fundraising is “dirty work” tainted by its association with money (Meisenbach et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The public—across various cultural and national contexts—is often uninformed or misinformed about fundraising's purposes, methods, processes, standards, and philosophies (Breeze, 2017; Breeze & Scaife, 2015; Shaker et al, 2019). In the US, fundraisers are sometimes valorized for providing an important service for social needs and sometimes plagued by stigma stemming from conceptions that fundraising is “dirty work” tainted by its association with money (Meisenbach et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, although ample attention is accorded to donors and their motivations, minimal attention is given to fundraisers and their interface with donors (Bekkers & Wiepking, 2011; Chapman et al, 2022). There is some new academic literature about fundraisers' experiences, behaviors, and views on fundraising published in the last decade (i.e., Alborough, 2019; Breeze, 2017; Breeze & Jollymore, 2017; Meisenbach et al, 2019; Nyman et al, 2018; Shaker et al, 2019; Shaker & Nathan, 2017). These studies provide crucial insights from the fundraisers' perspective but lack donors' points of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fundraisers generate philanthropic funds for nonprofits by identifying potential donors, cultivating relationships, creating fundraising appeals, soliciting gifts, and stewarding and renewing contributions; giving, in turn, generates many positive intellectual, emotional, and physical benefits for donors (Konrath, 2016). Yet, fundraising has long been stigmatized because of perceptions that it constitutes financial transactions facilitated by people who apply pressure to acquire gifts and who quickly leave one job for another in search of personal advancement (Breeze, 2017; Meisenbach et al, 2018; Shaker et al, 2019). A long‐standing debate also addresses whether fundraising has attained status as a “profession,” intimating the field's continued quest for broad public understanding and respect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, fundraising has long been stigmatized because of perceptions that it constitutes financial transactions facilitated by people who apply pressure to acquire gifts and who quickly leave one job for another in search of personal advancement (Breeze, 2017;Meisenbach et al, 2018;Shaker et al, 2019). A long-standing debate also addresses whether fundraising has attained status as a "profession," intimating the field's continued quest for broad public understanding and respect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%