Professional PR Ethics in Developing Economies: Comparative Analysis of Russia and Thailand

Гавра, Д.; Savitskaya, Alyona; Slutskiy, Pavel

doi:10.26351/nrps/1-2/4

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Third, like [5,77,82], we show that the attitudes toward certain actors (the public, clients, their organizations, other PR specialists) depend on the normative legal structures that are present in the country, ethical codes in the industry, and informal collective ethical principles established in the Russian political PR industry. Our informants claimed that the moral principles that they used are inherited from parents and have a universal character.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 81%

Exploring the ethics of political PR professionals using moral foundations theory

Mikhaylova

Abramov

2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper offers a multidimensional theoretical scheme to analyze professional ethics in the field of political public relations. We suggest investigating the decisions of these professionals using moral foundations theory because human ethical reasoning is contextual, and the examination of ethics in a one-dimensional manner as previous researchers have done overlooks the complexity of the moral choices that such professionals make. The prospects of the proposed theoretical approach are demonstrated on 16 interviews with post-soviet Russian political PR industry leaders that were conducted from March 2018 to April 2020. Our empirical findings show that Russian political PR specialists employ all moral foundations, however, in their narratives the “care/harm” and “authority/respect” foundations were not mentioned very often. Overall, this paper makes a critical contribution to research on professional ethics in political public relations, and it provides important insight into the specifics of moral reasoning in the Russian political PR industry that is insufficiently described in the current literature.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 81%