“…Although participants reported using MI for all five functions: cognitive specific, cognitive general, motivational general-arousal, motivational general-mastery, motivational specific imageries (Cumming & Hall, 2002), motivational general-mastery and cognitive specific imageries were the most frequently used by the tennis players as generally observed in the literature (Slimani et al, 2016). Indeed, studies revealed that MI facilitated the learning and increased performance in service (e.g., Blankert & Hamstra, 2017;Cherappurath et al, 2020;Dominique et al, 2021;Fekih et al, 2020b;Noel, 1980), service return (Coelho et al, 2007;Robin et al, 2007), volley (Cherappurath et al, 2017;Türk et al 2019), forehand and backhand stroke (Dana & Gozalzadeh, 2017;Hegazy et al, 2015;Koehn et al, 2014), or general (Mathers, 2017;Morais et al, 2019) performances. One applied implication is the importance of educating tennis players, especially beginners and non-experts, on the value of using different function of MI (Cumming & Hall, 2002), including the motivational specific function which can influence intrinsic motivation and the motivational general-arousal function which is associated with stress, anxiety and arousal regulation which will find its use especially during competitions.…”