2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-009-0091-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proficiency test for radioactivity measurements in nuclear medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the correct measurement of activity administered to the patient is a relevant part of a nuclear medicine procedure, it is recommended that the regulating agency CNEN intensifies its inspections of nuclear medicine services to verify their compliance with the Standard NN-3.05 requirements. Another recommendation would be for a gradual replacement of calibrators equipped with G-M detectors because of their poor performance, requiring more corrections, as demonstrated by the present study as well as by other studies previously published by the authors (9)(10)(11)(12) . The present study neither endorse nor divulge any ra-dionuclide calibrator model, but is limited to a description of the results obtained with the studied calibrators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Considering that the correct measurement of activity administered to the patient is a relevant part of a nuclear medicine procedure, it is recommended that the regulating agency CNEN intensifies its inspections of nuclear medicine services to verify their compliance with the Standard NN-3.05 requirements. Another recommendation would be for a gradual replacement of calibrators equipped with G-M detectors because of their poor performance, requiring more corrections, as demonstrated by the present study as well as by other studies previously published by the authors (9)(10)(11)(12) . The present study neither endorse nor divulge any ra-dionuclide calibrator model, but is limited to a description of the results obtained with the studied calibrators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%