2019
DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1572614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profile clustering in clinical trials with longitudinal and functional data methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…clusters that were as heterogeneous as possible from each other). KmL has been shown to have good clustering performance, especially when the sample size or number of measurement points is small [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…clusters that were as heterogeneous as possible from each other). KmL has been shown to have good clustering performance, especially when the sample size or number of measurement points is small [ 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the limitations of this study are the use of the last menstrual period and Dubowitz methods to derive GA, which is less precise compared to early pregnancy ultrasound assessment. Moreover, the clustering approach tested here was not compared to other methods for clustering trajectories, although the performance of k-means using Fréchet distance is closely related to that of latent class growth analysis when trajectories vary smoothly with time 18 . However, the variability of clusters is expected within each clustering method and no standard for clustering has been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCMM method was used to achieve a model-based longitudinal clustering of participant profiles in different groups according to their temporal evolution in DASS-21 depression, anxiety and stress scores ( 33 , 35 , 36 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%