Profiles of Active Transportation among Children and Adolescents in the Global Matrix 3.0 Initiative: A 49-Country Comparison

Abstract

This article aims to compare the prevalence of active transportation among children and adolescents from 49 countries at different levels of development. The data was extracted from the Report Cards on Physical Activity for Children and Youth from the 49 countries that participated in the Global Matrix 3.0 initiative. Descriptive statistics and a latent profile analysis with active transportation, Human Development Index and Gini index as latent variables were conducted. The global average grade was a “C”, indicating that countries are succeeding with about half of children and youth (47–53%). There is wide variability in the prevalence and in the definition of active transportation globally. Three different profiles of countries were identified based on active transportation grades, Human Development Index (HDI) and income inequalities. The first profile grouped very high HDI countries with low prevalence of active transport and low inequalities. The second profile grouped low and middle HDI countries with high prevalence of active transportation and higher inequalities. And the third profile was characterized by the relatively high prevalence of active transportation and more variability in the socioeconomic variables. Promising policies from countries under each profile were identified. A unified definition of active transportation and contextualized methods for its assessment are needed to advance in surveillance and practice.

Correlates of Active Commuting to School among Portuguese Adolescents: An Ecological Model Approach

“…The importance of the economic question can also be extrapolated to the national dimension. The investigation by González, et al [ 52 ] demonstrated that when comparing the prevalence of AC among children and adolescents from 49 countries at different levels of development, countries with a very high Human Development Index have low prevalence of AC and low inequalities, but there are countries, such as the Netherlands, that manage to invert this relation [ 53 ]. Thus, people are more likely to travel by private car and motorcycle by reason of convenience, timeliness, and reliability [ 18 ].…”

Development and Initial Validation of the PILCAST Questionnaire: Understanding Parents’ Intentions to Let Their Child Cycle or Walk to School

“…Active school transportation (AST), also known as cycling and walking to school, is an opportunity to increase PA at the population level [ 4 , 5 ]. Unfortunately, only about 54–59% of children and the youth in Sweden use active transport modes [ 6 ]. This is low compared to neighboring countries such as Finland and Denmark, where 74–79% of children and the youth use active transport.…”

Socio-Demographic Correlates of Cycling to School among 12- to 15-Year Olds in Southern Germany

“…According to the Global Matrix 3.0, Germany was graded with C– based on reports that ca. 40% of children and adolescents use active modes to commute to school [ 13 ].…”