2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiles of dysfluency and errors in classroom discourse among children with language impairment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, all of these studies used a naturalistic approach in which evidence of monitoring ability was derived from children's spontaneous speech at home or in the classroom (e.g., Evans, 1985;Peets, 2009). Very few studies have used a structured task to investigate children's ability to monitor their speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all of these studies used a naturalistic approach in which evidence of monitoring ability was derived from children's spontaneous speech at home or in the classroom (e.g., Evans, 1985;Peets, 2009). Very few studies have used a structured task to investigate children's ability to monitor their speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty related to content would really be more expected in the population with SLI, because it presents lower domain of language rules in its several linguistic aspects (12)(13)(14) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effectively, a higher rate of speech disfluencies is associated with children with SLI, because they would require more time to plan and formulate sentences. A low level of automaticity to formulate the language is also attributed to them as a result of the delay to domain certain grammatical forms, which would also lead to the higher incidence of word repetition in their discourse (13,14) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…less repetition of words or more diverse language forms). Furthermore, TTR has been used to measure semantic complexity in children (Peets, 2009); normal adults (Silverman, 1977) and adults with mental disorder and neurological injury (Manschreck et al, 1985). …”
Section: 0 Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%