Objective: Some clinicians and researchers have questioned the appropriateness of police referrals to psychiatric emergency services and have suggested that police exercise undue influence on hospital admission decisions. The purpose of this study was to test these assertions.
Methods:Research clinicians in nine emergency services in California observed staff evaluations of 112 cases and rated patients' symptom severity, danger to self or others, and grave disability. They also reviewed the criminal justice records of these patients both before and for 18 months after the index evaluation. A total of 186 patients referred by police were compared with 577 patients not referred by police.Results: Patients brought by police were more likely to be subsequently hospitalized, but they were also more psychiatrically disturbed. They were more dangerous to others and more gravely disabled. They were no more likely to have a criminal record than patients not referred by police.
Conclusions:Police did not exercise undue influence on dispositions nor were the patients they brought in more "criminal" than others.Police officers have been called the primary referral source for psychiatric assistance in the community (1,2) and are among the most important providers of front-line crisis intervention, particularly for poor and underprivileged persons (3,4). To understand how emergency room personnel make decisions to hospitalize persons with psychiatric disorders, several authors have investigated referrals by police officers and have reported that a large proportion of such admissions are police referrals (5,6). Some authors have even suggested that police exercise undue influence over admission decisions (7). Psychiatric emergency service staff often view patients referred by police as "their most undesirable cases: hostile, aggressive young males" (8). Some authors have assumed that police referrals to emergency rooms represent an effort to hospitalize people who are really criminals (9,10). Steadman and associates (8,11