2005
DOI: 10.1242/dev.01693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progenitors resume generating neurons after temporary inhibition of neurogenesis by Notch activation in the mammalian cerebral cortex

Abstract: of a Cre expression vector to remove caNotch, doubletransfected cells, in which caNotch was excised, migrated into the cortical plate and differentiated into neurons specific to upper layers. Bromodeoxyuridine-labeling experiments showed that the neurons were born after Cre transfection. These results indicate that cortical progenitors that had been temporarily subjected to Notch activation at an early stage generated neurons at later stages, but that the generation of low-layer neurons was skipped. Moreover, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
85
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Loss of Hes1 and Hes5 result in progenitor depletion and promote premature neuronal differentiation (Kageyama et al, 2005;Yoon and Gaiano, 2005). By contrast, increased or persistent activation of Notch1 promotes maintenance of a progenitor state and inhibits neuronal differentiation (Gaiano et al, 2000;Mizutani and Saito, 2005). Taken together with reports of Hes1 and Hes5 in the developing Arc (Kita et al, 2007;McNay et al, 2006;Pelling et al, 2011;Shimogori et al, 2010), we hypothesize that Notch/Rbpjκ signaling may play a role in maintaining progenitors and controlling differentiation of Arc neurons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Loss of Hes1 and Hes5 result in progenitor depletion and promote premature neuronal differentiation (Kageyama et al, 2005;Yoon and Gaiano, 2005). By contrast, increased or persistent activation of Notch1 promotes maintenance of a progenitor state and inhibits neuronal differentiation (Gaiano et al, 2000;Mizutani and Saito, 2005). Taken together with reports of Hes1 and Hes5 in the developing Arc (Kita et al, 2007;McNay et al, 2006;Pelling et al, 2011;Shimogori et al, 2010), we hypothesize that Notch/Rbpjκ signaling may play a role in maintaining progenitors and controlling differentiation of Arc neurons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Furthermore, this aspect of Notch activity may be a general feature of nervous system development. Sustaining Notch activity for a period and then releasing it in the cerebral cortex allowed resumption of the production of the temporally appropriate neurons (33). Similarly, the well defined progenitor progression which occurs in the Drosophila CNS does not depend on the precise regulation of Notch activity (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BrdU incorporation was then assessed in the adult offspring. This BrdU concentration is sufficient to label rapidly dividing embryonic neural progenitor cells in vivo with a single injection (Mizutani and Saito, 2005). The morning of detection of postcopulatory vaginal plug was considered E0.5.…”
Section: Brdu Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%