1989
DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90032-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosis of the adenocarcinoma of the cervix uteri: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be related to limited number of node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of cervix. In some studies, similarly, a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis and decreased survival in adenocarcinoma compared to squamous cell carcinoma was reported when stage and tumor size were controlled (13,15,25) . In analysis of patients with metastatic lymph nodes, which included 111 with squamous cell carcinoma and 17 with adenocarcinoma, any statistically significant difference was found in survival between two cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be related to limited number of node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of cervix. In some studies, similarly, a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis and decreased survival in adenocarcinoma compared to squamous cell carcinoma was reported when stage and tumor size were controlled (13,15,25) . In analysis of patients with metastatic lymph nodes, which included 111 with squamous cell carcinoma and 17 with adenocarcinoma, any statistically significant difference was found in survival between two cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It is controversial whether or not patients with adenocarcinoma has poorer prognosis than patients with squamous cell carcinoma in stage IB cervical cancer. Several retrospective series suggest that survival was equivalent for patients with both cell types (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) ; while others noted that adenocarcinoma was related with poorer prognosis (3,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) . In 1996, Gynecologic Oncology Group reported that survival was equivalent for patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of cervix; but adenosquamous carcinoma is associated with poorer prognosis (16) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, survival was not correlated with clinical stage (borderline significance), a finding that was consistent with a previous report. 3 Stepwise regression analysis revealed that the expression of p21 WAF1/CIP1 and negative lymph node metastasis were the best predictors of a favorable prognosis, and that the expression of p21 WAF1/CIP1 was almost as important as lymph node status in this respect. p21 WAF1/CIP1 , which is an inhibitor of G1 cdks, suppresses the cell cycle and inhibits DNA synthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1 A poorer prognosis for cervical adenocarcinoma than for squamous cell carcinoma has been emphasized by some authors because of 1) the difficulty of diagnosing early glandular lesions, and 2) the lower sensitivity of the former to radiotherapy. 1,3 However, others have claimed that patients with these two types of cervical carcinoma have almost equal prognoses. 2,4 It has also been reported that the prognoses of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma are associated with the size of the tumor, the presence of pelvic lymph node metastases, the stage of the disease, and the grade of the tumor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is controversial whether there is a difference in survival between women with squamous cell carcinoma and those with adenocarcinoma of the cervix, 15,16 it seems that the most significant difference in prognosis between the 2 types of cervical cancer occurs in patients with surgically detected pelvic lymph node metastasis. 5, 6 Nakanishi et al 6 analyzed the literature regarding prognosis of patients with cervical cancer treated surgically and concluded that the difference in prognosis between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma depends on the ratio of node-positive cases with adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%