Background:In the surgical treatment for early-stage cervical carcinoma, it is important to identify preoperatively a low-risk group of patients as candidates for less radical surgery to avoid the morbidity associated with radical hysterectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between tumor diameter measured preoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathological prognostic factors in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.Methods:A total of 125 patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer were included in this study. Clinical records, pathology reports, and MRI findings were retrospectively reviewed.Results:Histological diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma in 57 patients and nonsquamous cell carcinoma in 68 patients. All patients underwent preoperative evaluation by MRI within a median period of 13.5 days before surgery. The tumor diameter measured by MRI ranged from zero (no tumor detected) to 42 mm, with a median of 23 mm. Pathological prognostic factors included parametrial involvement, lymph node metastasis, deep stromal invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion. All these factors were found less frequently in patients with a smaller tumor diameter. Most notably, parametrial involvement was seen in none of the patients with tumors 20 mm or less and was detected only in patients with tumors greater than 20 mm (P = 0.01).Conclusions:In the FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma, the tumor diameter measured preoperatively by MRI correlates well with other pathological prognostic factors, especially with parametrial involvement. This finding suggests that the tumor diameter measured in preoperative MRI may serve as a strong predictor of parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma, which can be used to select a candidate population for less radical surgery without the need for a cone biopsy before hysterectomy.
Background: As atypical polypoid adenomyoma (APA) has been reported to be a hormone-related tumor, we aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of maintenance hormonal therapy after fertility-preserving treatment of these patients with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). Methods: Data were retrospectively analyzed from patients with APA who were treated with a fertility-preserving regimen including MPA between October 2001 and December 2011. Eighteen patients were treated with MPA and 14 (77.8%) achieved either a complete or a partial response after the planned treatment. Five patients took progestin for maintenance therapy. Results: Eighteen patients were treated for a mean observation period of 96.7 months. While taking the maintenance therapy, no patient had APA relapse. One patient developed welldifferentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma 18 months after she stopped taking maintenance progestin. Eleven patients without maintenance therapy underwent hysterectomy, andnine of them developed well-differentiated endometrial cancer. Through univariate analysis, there was a significant difference in time to hysterectomy between patients with and without maintenance therapy (P = 0.015). Through multivariate analysis, body mass index (BMI), menstrual status before protocol therapy, maintenance treatment, and pregnancy were found to be significantly associated with a lower risk of hysterectomy. No patient had a recurrence of APA after hysterectomy during the observation period (median, 54 months; range, 2-148 months). Conclusion: No patient showed progression while receiving hormonal therapy, including initial protocol therapy. Maintenance hormonal therapy after treatment with MPA was highly effective and safe, particularly in patients with BMI ≧24 kg/m 2 and irregular menstruation cycle.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.