Objectives/Hypothesis
To better understand aesthetic patient‐reported outcomes and psychosocial quality of life (QOL) after head and neck microvascular reconstruction for benign or malignant tumors.
Study Design
Single‐center prospectively obtained in‐office validated questionnaire‐based study.
Methods
Analysis of prospectively collected surveys at a tertiary care academic center from June 2018 to February 2021. Patients completed two FACE‐Q scales: Appearance‐Related Psychosocial Distress (ARPD) and Social Function (SF). Survey scores, demographics, operative course, and adjuvant therapy data underwent univariate and multivariable analyses.
Results
One hundred and three patients completed surveys at a median of 13.5 months postoperatively (interquartile range: 5.2–30.8). Mean ARPD from 0 (no distress) to 100 (maximum distress) was 32.4 (standard error of the mean [SEM]: 2.7). Mean SF from 0 (worst functioning) to 100 (best functioning) was 55.5 (SEM: 2.7). Postoperative adjuvant radiation was associated with 13.9% higher ARPD (95% CI: 3.4–24.4, P = .019) and 10.4% lower SF (95% CI: −20.7 to −0.1, P = .047). Each appearance‐related question on the ARPD scale independently predicted impaired SF (P < .001 for all questions). Upon multivariable logistic regression, osteocutaneous reconstruction, compared to soft tissue alone (P = .043), and postoperative adjuvant radiation (P = .014) were associated with higher levels of ARPD. Age, sex, relationship status, anxiety or depression history, defect location, and hospital stay were not significantly associated with ARPD or SF scores.
Conclusions
Aesthetic outcomes are important determinants of psychosocial QOL following head and neck microvascular reconstruction: an effect that is worsened by adjuvant radiation. Reconstructive surgeons should prioritize aesthetic outcomes, in addition to functional restoration, to optimize social functioning in patients with head and neck tumors.
Level of Evidence
3 Laryngoscope, 131:E2204–E2211, 2021