1993
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.77.11.688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors following enucleation of 111 uveal melanomas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The postbrachytherapy follow up included A-scan and B-scan ultrasonography and a clinical examination (including metastatic evaluation) 3 months after the surgery and every 6.6 (0.3) (mean (SE)) months thereafter (a total of 1001 examinations). Each patient was examined on average 5.6 times (range [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Thirty three of the 147 patients died during the…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The postbrachytherapy follow up included A-scan and B-scan ultrasonography and a clinical examination (including metastatic evaluation) 3 months after the surgery and every 6.6 (0.3) (mean (SE)) months thereafter (a total of 1001 examinations). Each patient was examined on average 5.6 times (range [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Thirty three of the 147 patients died during the…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 9 Thus, it is important to define clinical factors predictive of metastatic spread. Such unfavourable prognostic parameters include a larger tumour diameter, 10 a faster growing tumour, 11 presence of extrascleral growth, tumour margin location anterior to the equator of the eye, 12 ciliary body involvement, 13 older age, 10 male sex, 10 tumour induced glaucoma, 14 and specific microvascular patterns 10 15 which can be assessed clinically either by confocal indocyanine green angiography [16][17][18] or ultrasound backscatter parameters. 19 We have previously shown that, following brachytherapy, larger tumours shrink significantly faster than smaller ones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 This classification, the Linear LBD, has been used in multiple publications since that time. [4][5][6] This classification has only one size parameter, making it the easiest among the tumor size classifications evaluated in this study to use. Although we could find no explanation why LBD of 10 and 15 mm were selected as boundary lines for this classification, our study shows this classification system to be the best prognostic indicator of metastasis-free survival by the log rank test of trend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][8][9][10][11][12][13][15][16][17]20,23 The authors formed a three-category Rectangular LBD 3 TH classification by combining two ''two-category'' LBD 3 TH classifications (one defining a ''small'' tumor as LBD 3 TH 30 mm 2 and regarding all others as large, 24 another defining a ''large'' tumor as LBD 3 TH >100 mm 2 and regarding all others as small). 19 Finally, two additional three-category classifications were created by merging subgroups of the four-category TNM 2010 classification 25 as follows: TNM 2010a combined T1 and T2 subgroups, and TNM 2010b combined T2 and T3 subgroups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation