1995
DOI: 10.1016/0196-0709(95)90041-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors in paranasal sinus cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference was highly significant in the log-rank analysis, as suggested in previous reports. 17,66,76,95,96,104,111,134,135,139,154,167,169,180 The meta-analysis confirmed that surgery (70%) and combined surgery and radiation (56%) offer better local control and cure rates than radiotherapy alone (33%). Most series, including ours, are biased in patient selection, and no randomized study has been published.…”
Section: Treatment Modalitymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The difference was highly significant in the log-rank analysis, as suggested in previous reports. 17,66,76,95,96,104,111,134,135,139,154,167,169,180 The meta-analysis confirmed that surgery (70%) and combined surgery and radiation (56%) offer better local control and cure rates than radiotherapy alone (33%). Most series, including ours, are biased in patient selection, and no randomized study has been published.…”
Section: Treatment Modalitymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, these data have to be specified in several ways, as discussed in the prognostic section of this review. The male:female ratio has been reported as 2:1 [1,5], but with an increasing age of the patients this ratio seems to adjust, as reported by Robin et al [3] in a study on a large group of patients from the UK. Malignant sinonasal tumors can occur at any age, but the majority is seen at an older age in the sixth and seventh decades of life [6,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…29 Comparison of those individuals with no dural invasion to those with either dural or brain invasion reveals a significantly worse prognosis in the last group. 15,30 Dural invasion alone seems for most of the authors to be detrimental to survival, decreasing 5-year survival from 68% to 25% in a series of 63 adenocarcinomas 22 and from 83% to 22% in patients undergoing craniofacial resection.…”
Section: Factors Related To Tumor Invasiveness and Stagementioning
confidence: 97%