Prognostic Factors of COVID‐19: An Umbrella Review Endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology

Abstract

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, the urgency for updated evidence to inform public health and clinical care placed systematic literature reviews (SLRs) at the cornerstone of research. We aimed to summarize evidence on prognostic factors for COVID‐19 outcomes through published SLRs and to critically assess quality elements in the findings' interpretation. An umbrella review was conducted via electronic databases from January 2020 to April 2022. All SLRs (and meta‐analyses) in English were considered. Data screening and extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers. AMSTAR 2 tool was used to assess SLR quality. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD4202232576). Out of 4,564 publications, 171 SLRs were included of which 3 were umbrella reviews. Our primary analysis included 35 SLRs published in 2022, which incorporated studies since the beginning of the pandemic. Consistent findings showed that, for adults, older age, obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and cancer were more strongly predictive of risk of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and mortality due to COVID‐19. Male sex was associated with higher risk of short‐term adverse outcomes, but female sex was associated with higher risk of long COVID. For children, socioeconomic determinants that may unravel COVID‐19 disparities were rarely reported. This review highlights key prognostic factors of COVID‐19, which can help clinicians and health officers identify high‐risk groups for optimal care. Findings can also help optimize confounding adjustment and patient phenotyping in comparative effectiveness research. A living SLR approach may facilitate dissemination of new findings. This paper is endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology.

Serological markers and Post COVID-19 Condition (PCC) – A rapid review of the evidence

“…Given the complexity of the condition, a diverse range of potential predictors warrant consideration. Older age, female sex, pre-existing conditions (e.g., high BMI, asthma, and diabetes), and severity of acute illness, have frequently been proposed as risk factors for postacute sequelae [3,4,15,[18][19][20]. Additionally, a number of biomarkers have been investigated but currently, there is no consensus as to whether any characterize PCC [14,16,17].…”

“…The etiology of PCC remains uncertain, though several underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, such as cellular damage, inflammatory cytokines, and a hypercoagulable state, are thought to contribute to PCC inception and trajectory [7,[14][15][16][17].Given the complexity of the condition, a diverse range of potential predictors warrant consideration. Older age, female sex, pre-existing conditions (e.g., high BMI, asthma, and diabetes), and severity of acute illness, have frequently been proposed as risk factors for postacute sequelae [3,4,15,[18][19][20]. Additionally, a number of biomarkers have been investigated but currently, there is no consensus as to whether any characterize PCC [14,16,17].Investigation of potential serological markers of PCC, accounting for clinical covariates, may yield pathophysiological insights.…”