The use of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) has helped transition the care pathways of patients with early stage breast cancer from an anatomically based treatment algorithm to a rational, clinically and biologically based strategy, informed by the likelihood of recurrence and the relative benefit derived from therapies. On the basis of initial data 1 demonstrating both the prognostic and predictive capabilities of the 21-gene RS in oestrogenreceptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, oncologists and patients embraced its use to omit chemotherapy if this treatment would be of limited or no benefit, and to justify the use of chemotherapy in patients with high-risk disease. Results of the full prospective analyses of the TAILORx trial are still awaited; however, initial data from this trial that were published in 2015 (REF. 2) were reassuring because they demonstrated that women with ER-positive, lymph-node-negative breast cancer and a predicted very low risk of disease recurrence according to the 21-gene RS (RS <11) have excellent outcomes when treated with endocrine therapy alone.Two publications 3,4 now highlight the clinical uptake of the 21-gene RS assay in the USA and its use in additional settings beyond the traditional population of patients with early stage, lymph-node-negative breast cancer. In the TBCRC 013 study, King et al. 3 undertook a prospective registry to evaluate the role of median TTP was not reached in the patients with a low RS who were treated with endocrine therapy, compared with a median TTP of 15 months in those with high RS 3 . Indeed, the exploratory analysis suggested that, among the patients who received endocrine therapy, the outcomes were worse for those with high RS compared with those with low or intermediate RS. The median TTP for patients who received endocrine therapy was 15 months in the high-RS group compared with not reached and 25 months in the low-RS and intermediate-RS groups, respectively (P = 0.007) whereas, for patients who received chemotherapy, no difference in outcomes was observed among RS groups (P = 0.61) 3 . Thus, the authors speculated that a high-RS might be a predictor of resistance to endocrine therapy in patients with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer 3 .This report has limitations, which include the short duration of follow up, the small sample size, and the bias of selection of therapy by patient and physician choice. Nonetheless, this exploratory analysis provides useful preliminary data to inform the difficult choice regarding initial systemic therapy for patients presenting with metastatic disease. Most oncologists consider first-line treatment with endocrine therapy to be preferable over chemotherapy for patients with ER-positive metastatic disease, except in the setting of impending visceral crises; this preference is endorsed by treatment guidelines 5 . The data from King and collaborators 3 suggest that the 21-gene RS could identify which patients who would normally receive endocrine therapy might be better served with chemotherapy. In addition, str...