2018
DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic, predictive, and pharmacogenomic assessments of CDX2 refine stratification of colorectal cancer

Abstract: We aimed to refine the value of CDX2 as an independent prognostic and predictive biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) according to disease stage and chemotherapy sensitivity in preclinical models. CDX2 expression was evaluated in 1045 stage I–IV primary CRCs by gene expression (n = 403) or immunohistochemistry (n = 642) and in relation to 5‐year relapse‐free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and chemotherapy. Pharmacogenomic associations between CDX2 expression and 69 chemotherapeutics were assessed by dr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
46
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
13
46
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our real-world data shows that mCRC patients who have non-resectable metastatic disease with CDX2 loss have a worse prognosis, receive less first-and second-line chemotherapy with less benefit and rarely receive secondary surgery. The incidence of CDX2 loss was 19%, comparable to previous published results on stage IV CRC patients in population-based cohort studies (8,15). Others have reported lower frequency of CDX2 loss, but most of these studies have very few patients with stage IV disease (21,22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our real-world data shows that mCRC patients who have non-resectable metastatic disease with CDX2 loss have a worse prognosis, receive less first-and second-line chemotherapy with less benefit and rarely receive secondary surgery. The incidence of CDX2 loss was 19%, comparable to previous published results on stage IV CRC patients in population-based cohort studies (8,15). Others have reported lower frequency of CDX2 loss, but most of these studies have very few patients with stage IV disease (21,22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis for CDX2 is implemented in the clinical diagnostics as a biomarker for intestinal differentiation in tumors of unknown origin. It is deregulated in a subset of patients with CRC, and downregulation has been associated with poor prognosis (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Loss of CDX2 expression has also been associated with other poor prognostic features such as advanced stages, poor differentiation, BRAF mutation (BRAFmut), and microsatellite instability (MSI) (12,14,15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent studies showed that CDX2 targets the multidrug resistance gene MDR1 (ABCB1) and CFTR (ABCC7), coding for two ATP-dependent drug efflet pumps [36][37][38]. These genes are significantly down-regulated in CDX2-negative cell lines and CDX2-negative patient tumors and have also been reported to promote the response to chemotherapy [24,38]. This supports our results showing that CDX2-positive cases show a poor response to chemotherapy which may be effective in patients with CDX2-negative CRC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%